Wednesday 25 April 2012

JSA DOCUMENT


JAN SWASTHYA ABHIYAN

Statement on Universal Health Care

On the occasion of World Health Day – April 7th 2012

BACKGROUND

Over the past year there has been a lot of interest in and visibility of the concept of Universal Health Care. The Planning commission had set up the High Level Expert Group (HLEG) on Universal Health Care (UHC) in October 2011 to inform the 12th plan which was being finalized. Similarly the Prime Minister during his address to the nation on the occasion of Republic Day 2012 also mentioned that like the 11th plan was focussed on education, the 12th plan would be focussed on health.

The JSA discussed the HLEG report on UHC as well as the Report of the Steering Group on Health with its proposals for UHC during a two day workshop in Delhi on the 21st and 22nd of March 2012. This statement is based on the emerging understanding of the concept as well as the concerns expressed during that meeting and discussions both before and on going.

While JSA welcomes this interest and commitment to health by the government of India, on the occasion of World Health Day it would like to set out clearly its views on the issue as well as express very serious concern with the direction in which the discourse on Universal Health Care seems to be going.

JSA's STARTING PRINCIPLES

JSA believes and reiterates that Health is a fundamental human right, that the government is responsible for the provision of health care as well as an enabling environment for the realization of this right to health which includes the right to control over the social determinants of health. As noted by the Special Rapporteur for  the Right to Health, the Right to health includes the Right of people to participate in all decisions related to health, the implementation of these policies as well as their monitoring and evaluation.

Our starting principles continue to be the Right to Health and the Social Determinants of Health, and equally the principles of Comprehensive Primary Health Care as enunciated in Alma Ata.

We believe and reiterate that Health Care is only one of the many determinants of health. Mere access to health care even if universal will have no meaning unless these larger social determinants of health are squarely addressed and issues of caste, class and gender are engaged with as a society. JSA  believes that the goal of Health for ALL! Will definitely be furthered significantly with the introduction of Universal Health Care, however we believe that what needs to be universalized needs to be reflected upon. We do not believe that a mere expansion of access to the present technology and industry driven, commodified, irrational and impersonal form of medicine that is dominant in today's world is the answer. In fact we fear that a superficial and hurried attempt at universalizing an “essential health package” in the present un-regulated situation in which there is absolutely no accountability of the system to the people it purports to serve will only increase the problems people face and increase inequity. What is required is a complete re-think of medicine as it is practiced, starting with people and looking at all resources available for health including the AYUSH, folk medicine and self – care at the family and community level.

THE HLEG AND STEERING COMMITTEE REPORTS

The JSA welcomes a number of key aspects of the HLEG report. Most importantly we appreciate:

·         The emphasis of the report on the concept of “universal” over the earlier dominant “selective” or “cost- effective” package. .
·         The complete rejection of user fees in the health system.
·      Bringing focus to the critical issue of human resources to the center of the table.
·      Clear statement against the private insurance route to health financing.
·      Defining the need and urgency of private sector regulation.
·      Bringing Community based accountability mechanisms to the center stage. .
·      The suggestion of a redressal mechanism.

It is indeed surprising that an issue of such critical importance to the country be crippled by such un realistic time lines. In this situation some of the crucial gaps we see in the HLEG report include,

·         The fact that the report has failed to undertake a more wide and deep consultation with all levels and groups of stake-holders in the health system.
·         That the report has failed to engage with the reality of the present context of development of the health system.
·         The report has also failed to question the present commodified nature of health and health care which is indeed one of the main reasons for both continuing preventable ill health as well as inequity.
·         There is a lack of detailing and operational suggestions in a number of critical aspects which pre-disposes to easy re- and mis-interpretation of the suggestions in a way that will further weaken the public sector.
·         The report suggests a number of new institutions, however we believe that what is needed is a new way of looking at health and the health system and making the current set of institutions more people centric rather than another slew of “expert” driven bodies with complicated lines of accountability to the people.

More recently the Steering Group of the Planning commission on health finalized its report which is available on the website of the planning commission. This report which incorporates (interprets) the findings of the HLEG into the Planning Commission process. The Steering committee report and its “interpretation” of the HLEG report have many concerning issues that are likely in our opinion to completely defeat the purpose and spirit behind any evolving process of Universal Health Care.

·         The reduction of the comprehensive Essential Health Package suggested by the HLEG into RCH and National Health Programs shows the very contracted nature of the vision of our health planners. This in no way can be considered as a Universal health package.
·         The concept of financial and operational autonomy of the public health facilities is also very problematic. While autonomy in operational terms is necessary for any health facility within the overall regulatory and accountability frameworks, financial autonomy is concept that needs to be defined further. If it means leaving the public sector to “fend for themselves” in the present environment, it will merely mean the death knell of this system and putting paid to any hopes for a Universal System.
·         The concept of “provider choice” is also problematic in the present situation of a historically neglected and dilapidated public health system and a private sector which has received encouragement and absolutely un regulated growth, enabling it to reap huge and obscene levels of profit and increasing inequity.
·         The designation of the District Health Society as the key player for empanelment and regulation without any allusion to the way in which these are functioning at present points out to the lack of engagement with reality.
·         Further more the suggestion that cost escalation will be contained by sticking to Standard treatment guidelines without questioning the basic commodification of health care again questions the vision of this report.
·         It suggests that one district in each state pilot this concept in the first year of the plan. We would strongly suggest that the unit of pilot should logically be the state, and more over that such pilots be initiated only after full discussion and public debate.

BROAD PRINCIPLES OF JSA

Health Care provisioning:

We firmly believe that the public health system has to be the back bone of any universal health system. In its present state it definitely cannot be so. The public health system has suffered years of neglect due to lack of funding, poor governance and active encouragement of the private sector.

It is also true that in order to cover the complete population for all the services the involvement of the private providers in some form may be necessary. However we hasten to add that the degree, form and content of the engagement needs to be decided after three critical steps:

·         Strengthening the primary level of care with more Health workers and encouraging and building up the capacity of self-care, and especially preventive and promotive care.
·         Bringing the public sector up to its full functional capacity and expanding it up to the level at which it is supposed to be including population norms and infrastructure at least upto the IPHS standards, before providing public monies to the private sector.
·         A detailed mapping and assessment be done for each district of the actual need of curative health care at each of primary, secondary and tertiary care after taking into account a fully strengthened primary level (including curative, preventive and promotive).

The private sector needs to be brought in only on the terms of public good. The integration of the public and private sector is not seen only in terms of provision and financing but most crucially in terms of an integration of the “logic” of the health system, with corporate profit not being allowed to lead or define health provision. The health system has to be strictly and transparently regulated with its primary goal being the people's welfare rather than private profit. It is only under such circumstances that we can develop a system that will truly serve the needs of the people equitably.

Financing:

There seems little doubt that the most widely successful way is through single pool, non-commercial, tax based financing. This needs to be in an environment of strict regulation. While a number of countries have provided models worth studying, India needs to chart out her own course. One thing for sure however is that what we are aiming for is health security and universal coverage and NOT the currently fashionable and politically convenient “insurance schemes for tertiary illnesses” of the Arogyashri type or the limited hospital based coverage of the RSBY type.

Governance:

Whatever the provisioning and the financing mechanisms, unless the governance of the whole system is firmly people centered and rights based these arrangements are likely to be exploited by the dominant and corportatized private sector. We envisage a community led and focussed process. We further visualize the institutionalizing a process of community based monitoring, planning and action for health. This process needs to evolve from the learnings from the on going experiences in a number of states of the country in which JSA partners are involved.

In addition to this we believe that there needs to be greater internal democracy. The public health system is ridden with hierarchies and power centralization. The private sector is driven by the need of extracting profit from people in their weakest moment, and is characterized by irrational and unnecessary interventions (both diagnostic and therapeutic). These issues too need to be engaged with comprehensively.

IN CONCLUSION

We welcome the attention and policy level commitment to health care, in this situation the JSA calls for the following:

·         A public debate on the contours of the proposed universal health system. Such an important issue cannot be rushed through and its various strands need to be discussed and understood widely by the people.
·         A definition of a clear and transparent and time bound road map for strengthening and expanding the public sector, including the budget to be allocated.
·         There must be a process of mapping and estimating need for health care services in each district and within each district in areas with special needs. This must be transparent and widely discussed by the people of the district.
·         There needs to be the enactment of adequate laws guaranteeing the right for health, laying down the framework for regulation of the health system and accountability and grievance redressal. 
·         The health system needs to ensure adequate and disaggregated information (both qualitative and quantitative) that is transparently collected and shared to guide its policies.
·         There should be no haste in rolling out these concepts – even the looming  large of the General elections should not become an excuse for the government to short circuit and co-opt the concept of Universal Health Care for narrow political gains. 





Monday 23 April 2012

Health Care in Haryana


Health Care  in Haryana

Although there has been considerable improvement in the health status as measured by the increase in life span
(Life Expectancy) from 33 to 66 years, fall in infant mortality rate and crude death rate, statistics also show that such achievements have fallen far short of the nation’s expectations. India is a country of paradoxes.
• It has the largest number of medical colleges in the world
• It produces among largest numbers of doctors in the developing world. These doctors are exported to many other countries, and are considered among the best in the world.
• This country gets 'Medical tourists' from many developed countries reflecting the high standard of medical skill and expertise here. They seek care in its state-of-the-art, high-tech hospitals which compare with the best in the world.
• Turning to medicines, we find that this country is the fourth largest producer of drugs by volume in the world and is among the largest exporter of drugs in the world. Of course, all these resources require finances. We find that people here do not lag behind in paying and spend a lot on healthcare -
more than many other developing countries. Despite the existence of such impressive healthcare
resources, as we begin to move around and talk to some people in the villages and towns of this country we are surprised to find that -
• Despite all these resources, the majority of citizens has very limited access to quality Healthcare, and has poor health indicators.
The report of the National Commission on Microeconomics and health (NCMH), Equitable Development  Health Future ,states that “ the probability of the poor falling sick is 2.3 times more than the rich and there is an 18 years difference in the life expectancy at birth between 72 years in Kerala and 58 years in Madhya Pradesh”India’s performance is worse than Bangladesh and Sri Lanka . Against India’s infant mortality rate of 68 per 1000 live births , Sri Lanka has only 8. Bangladesh also has under 5 mortality rate at 69 per 1000 births below India’s 87 in the same age group. McKinsey estimates that the health care spending in India will increase from Rs. 86,000 crore in 2000-2001 to over 200,000 crore by 2012.

• There are low levels of immunization - in fact less than half of the children are completely immunized (added to this, complete immunization coverage has declined in recent years!).
• Similarly, the minimum of three checkups during pregnancy remains unavailable for half of all pregnant women.
• There are massive inequities in access to healthcare - while the rich avail of most modern and expensive health services, the poor, especially in rural areas do not get even rudimentary healthcare.
• Hospitalization rates among the well off are six times higher than rates among the poor!
• Despite such a large drug industry which exports medicines across the globe, about two-thirds of the population lack access to essential drugs.
• This is a country of paradoxes where women from well off families suffer due to unnecessary cesarean operations - in some urban centers close to half of deliveries are done by operation- while their poorer rural sisters frequently die during childbirth due to lack of access to the same cesarean operation at time of genuine need.
• Although people spend a lot on healthcare (the poorest spend one-eighth of their total income on healthcare), the government spends much less. Of the total health spending in the country, all levels of government make less than one-fifth, while the remaining major portion is shelled out by ordinary citizens from their pockets. This makes the healthcare system in this country one of the most
privatised systems in the world.
• Taking loans or selling assets pays for two out of five hospitalization episodes. The proportion of people who are unable to access any form of treatment due to inability to pay is quite large and increasing.
A large private sector leads to high profit motives of private providers. It has been estimated that almost two-thirds of the medicines prescribed here by doctors are irrational or unnecessary. Nearly half of all outpatients receive mostly unnecessary injections. Hence we say that this is a country of tremendous paradoxes. And you must have of course guessed it by now - this is the country where all of us live.
This paradoxical country is India, where we have really poor healthcare at high cost, considerable healthcare resources but very poor healthcare access for the majority of people. Let alone the poor, even the middle class cannot easily afford major investigations, hospitalisation and operations. Why we are worse off in this respect even compared to other developing countries? How come the proportion of spending on public health in India is less than even our poor neighbors, Bangladesh and Nepal?

How Much Does Our Government Spend on Healthcare? How Much Do We Spend on Healthcare from Our Personal Resources?

The total value of the health sector in India today is annually over Rs.150, 000 crores or US$ 34 billion. This works out to about Rs.1500 per capita which is 6 per cent of GDP (see Table below). However, of this only 15 per cent is publicly financed, 4 per cent is from social insurance, 1 per cent private insurance and the remaining 80 per cent is spent out of personal resources. (85 per cent of which goes to the private sector).
The tragedy is that in India, as in most other countries, those who have the capacity to buy healthcare from the market may often get this care without having to pay for it directly, and those who are below the poverty line are forced to make direct payments to access healthcare from the market.
National data reveals that half of the people in the poorest 20% of population sold assets or took loans to access hospital care. Hence loans and sale of assets are estimated to contribute substantially to financing healthcare. This makes the need for social security even more imminent.

The health services have been dismally poor and inaccessible for a large majority of the population in India. This is duly acknowledged in “ National Rural Health Mission” document)2005), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, N. Delhi
                        There are three streams of health providers that have emerged in post independent India- the qualified allopathic doctors, the qualified doctors from the Indian System of Medicine and unqualified health providers – the latter by default have become the mainstay of health services for the bulk of Indian’s population. Thus the health infrastructure need to be strengthened in the country so that the people at large get quality health care.
With less than one percent of the GDP invested in public health provision, India is home to one fifth of the world diseases, where the regular  level of malnourished children is higher than that of Sub Saharan Africa and  with high rates of anaemia and maternal undernourishment
            Health is an indicator of well -being that has direct implications not only for the quality of life but also indirect implications for the production of economic goods and services. “ Health for all by the year 2000” was a national goal set by the Indian Govt in 1978.Since then a lot has been done in improving health both in rural and urban India. Despite all concerted efforts, however, India continues to have high level of morbidity, especially among infants, children, women and elderly. There is also a high incidence of  communicable diseases normally associated with low levels of sanitation, public and personal hygiene, poor quality of drinking water and under nutrition.
Haryana
The growth of Haryana state provides new opportunities.  The Government of the state of Haryana is engaged in the process of re-assessing the public health care system to arrive at policy options developing and harnessing the available human resources to make greater impact on the health status of the people.  As part of this effort, one should attempt to address the following 3 questions:
1.              How adequate are the existing human and material resources at various levels of care (namely from Sub Centre level to district hospital level) in the state; and how optimally have they been deployed?
  1. What factors contribute to or hinder the performance of the personnel in position at various levels of care?
  2. What structural features of the health care system as it has evolved affect its utilization and its effectiveness?
From the analysis of the situation in its totality, one  may proceed to make recommendations towards a policy on workforce management, with emphasis on organizational, motivational and capability building aspects.  One has to see how existing resources of manpower and materials can be optimally utilized and critical gaps identified and addressed .  The question is that how the facilities at different levels can be structured and reorganized.
A study was conducted- a questionnaire based survey of facilities that was applied on a sample of 128 Sub centres, 64 PHCs and 32 CHCs, also 356 employees of 8 cadres were interviewed in Chhatisgarh.and analysis was done
There are certain similarities of situation and a lot can be gathered from their experience. There are four types of stake holders in health service system in the state:
  1. The employees and their associations
  2. The officers at the national, state and district level
  3. The Medical profession and professional bodies.
  4. Civil society
It is noted that in the last decade the department of health in Haryana has seen a lot of new developments:

Annexure-I  and Annexure-II
However the constraints that the system has inherited are considerable.  A larger plan to reach a basic set of services for each level of the three tier health care system is needed.  It has been tried to chart out the contours of such a plan and project an approach to reaching it.  In the larger interests of improving the system the aim is to set out all the lacunae in workforce management and rationalization of services, explore its causes and set down the possibilities for immediate and long term action to improve and strengthen it.
Situational Analysis
Adequacy of “Sanctioned Facilities
As per existing norms one sub centre is planned for every 5000 population, one PHC for every 30,000 and one CHC for every 1,00,000 population.  For tribal areas the norm is one sub centre per 3000 population, one PHC per 20,000 population and one CHC per 80,000 population. We have 16,531,493 Rural Population

Annexure –III
Ø  We need 929 Sub Centre more .  131  more PHCs are needed along with the staff and other infrastructure required. We need 75 more CHCs.

Location of Facilities with relation to access

Amongst existing facilities there is considerable loss of utilization due to improper location and improper distribution.  In many of the cases, there is  considerable mal distribution.  And this is compounded by improper choice of village within the section or sector and the choice of venue within the village.
Adequacy of staff and their Utilization with Relation to Functionality of Centers:
Even the female para medical staff is not adequate in numbers.  There are serious shortfalls in all other staff.  Female worker has to share the greater part of the work load.  Many categories of staff at sub centre and PHC level are characterized by poorly designed work schedules and are poorly utilized with high degree of redundant work time.  Rationalization of paramedical work time offers therefore, the most effective route to addressing staff adequacy.

The current work description of Multi Purpose Health Worker(MPPW) female is unrealistic and is being coped with developing a focus on just one or two tasks and informal local arrangements.  As a result a number of essential services are completely left out (eg. early recognition of child hood pneumonia or proper treatment of diarrhea or adolescent health care etc.) and a quality of a number of other services, like antenatal care are seriously compromised (very few pregnant women get their BP taken and blood and urine tested).
Rationalisation of Drugs and Consumables supply:
The essential drug list is not being implemented.  The main deficits are a failure to procure the entire items of the list, a failure to send samples for quality control and a failure to exclude drugs not on the list.  Other  element of the drug policy are also not in place. Thus procurement is  problematic and sporadic, occurring once or twice a year with quotas to peripheral facilities to distribute the drugs.
There are numerous breaks in supply and the distribution system appears to be unresponsive to changing needs.  Restriction of drugs to a narrow spectrum and breaks in supply are not even perceived as serious within the system reflecting poor perception of quality of care issues.
The problem with consumables is even more serious than with drugs.  Laboratory chemicals seem the worst affected but even gauze and bandages, needles and needle holders could be in short supply repeatedly.
Rationalization of Equipment:
Low investment minor equipment like Sahil’s Haemoglobinometer or material required to test Haemoglobin or Blood Pressure apparatus and infant weighing machines, which, if used, will need replacement frequently.  Another group is ‘major equipment’ like ECG, USG(Ultrasound) and X-rays which require less replacement but require trained manpower to operate.  In minor category, there may be considerable under utilization.  Due to quality of care issues many of these instruments/equipment are not utilized.  If utilized then they require replacement for which ready system of purchases and restocking is required.
In major equipment, the main problem is mismatches between equipment supply and man power to use it. (e.g. ECG machines without any one who operate it), between equipment supply and level of services currently provided at that level (e.g. Halothane-a drug used for anesthesia, was sent at CHC levels where there was no anesthetist,  neonatal care units where there are no caesarean operations done, Color Doppler equipments supplied where there is no vascular, cardiologist or cardio thoracic surgeon available), between equipment supply and consumables available to use ( e.g. X-ray machines running out of X-ray film) and between equipment purchase and maintenance.
At one level all such mismatches are attributable to failures of concerned officials/officers.  But at another level it points to a governance/administrative failure, with one committee maximizing purchases, and another set of persons looking at distribution and no one looking at training and maintenance or eventual utilization of equipment.

Infrastructure Adequacy:
The short falls in basic availability of its own buildings  is well known. Toilet construction and maintenance too are major infrastructural inadequacies.  Maintenance of buildings is also poor and many buildings are old and need extensive renovation or replacement.
No Light at Sub Centre: Problems with electricity supply are also there.  Generator back up is not available at many places.  Inverter at CHC level .is available  – but are not .of sufficient time capacity.
Problems with water supply are however considerable. Most of these facilities have a bore well and hand pump so that they are functional.  However any hospital with in patient facilities, even if it were for only conducting normal delivery, would require running tap water, bathing facilities and toilets separately for staff and for patients..  How many of CHCs and PHCs have such a water supply arrangement?  Waste management based on segregation of wastes with proper disposal of each category of biological waste is a relatively untouched area of intervention.
Service Conditions
(Transfer; promotion; financial burdens; personal security, accommodation for staff)
The lack of a fair transparent system of transfer is easily one of the greatest causes of workforce dissatisfaction and demoralization.  Some staff spend their lifetimes working in remote areas seeking and never getting a transfer whereas others perceived to be able to personally and unfairly influence decision making to get priority postings through out their career.  This makes less staff willing to serve in rural areas and when they are so posted, do their work with such a deep rooted sense of frustration and anger that the quality of the work suffers.  The problems of doctors not willing to serve in rural areas should be seen only in this context and should not even be held out against the medical profession unless a basic transfer policy has been put in place.
Promotions need to be regular and timely and fair.  Otherwise it leads to a situation of deep dissatisfaction that runs through the entire department.  It has also been observed   that many times the positions of authority starting from the top most and proceeding through the CMOs up to BMOs are held in an adhoc and arbitrary manner. 
Further the opportunities for an active career plan for a talented doctor or one who is able to work hard and perform more are absent.  For paramedical staff too the lack of any possibility of promotion let alone a career plan acts as a great demotivation from taking any initiative.  These are all remediable aspects that need to be urgently attended to.
Another major problem is personal security, again a problem maximal with MPHW females.  Violence and sexual harassment, covert and overt affects about 10% but creates a sense of insecurity in all.  In Delivery Huts these type of problems have come to light recently. 
No definite pattern of venue: Another basic service issue is accommodation. At no level is there adequate housing for all staff. Available housing facility many times is not worth living. The focus has been on developing government housing for doctors first.  At the CHC level there is accommodation available, especially for doctors .  But it is seldom adequate to house even half the staff or even half the number of doctors.  Available accommodation is also underutilized because of many factors.
Laboratory Services:
Laboratory services at the sub centre are almost absent.  By laid down norms four basic tests – Blood pressure checking , weighing of pregnant women and children, blood haemoglobin estimation and urine testing for sugar and albumen (also E. S. R) are expected to take place here.
These above tests like BP check however do take place in PHCs but even here they are not regular.  The lab technicians are not available at many places.  Slide test is being done routinely. The PHC, as per norms, has a basic laboratory which can do about 20 basic diagnostic tests, has almost been forgotten within the system.  Microscope availability is there but underutilized.
In CHCs the laboratory is active to some extent but perform most of the time two tests, the blood smear examination for malarial parasites and the sputum examination for Acid Fast bacillus(AFB).  The list of desirable diagnostics at the CHC level is over 40 tests.  At most of the CHCs  the workload of these two tests is heavy.  Also as a consequence,  reaching back time, gets lengthened considerably (on an average 10 days to 20 days).  The blood smear examination has increasingly taken the form of a “modern” ritual denoting medical care devoid of content . Target of slide making is also a cause for it.  There is no major perception of the lack of laboratory services as a serious lacunae – again reflecting on the weaknesses in under standing and lack of emphasis of quality issues in medical care.
Referral Services:
The current referral services have two forms.  Firstly there is a fund placed at the disposal of the Panchayat for use to hire/pay for transport to shift needy patients to a hospital.  There is an understanding that this must be used for high risk and complication of child birth.  Funds flow and even awareness of this provision in Panchayats is low and because of other structural constraints (lack of vehicle; inability to call vehicle in time etc) its utilization is very low even as the need for referral goes unanswered.
The other referral is the patient being asked orally or with a slip to go and seek treatment at a higher centre.  This brings no advantage to patient or to the system and is perceived by the patient as the referral facility having deliberately or otherwise failed to deliver its services.  There are no clear norms for what is to be referred and when and there are no mechanisms to monitor referral to reduce unnecessary referral and insist on necessary ones.  There is no feedback of any sort.  In short there is no referral system.
The third system is that there is no need of referral system for going to corporate hospitals for treatment.  The rates are fixed. You  go directly, get the treatment, pay the bills and get the money reimbursed.  It has created more problems.  Those who can not pay from their pocket in advance are at loss in such an arrangement.
Integration with Indian System of Medicines:

There is large manpower in (Indian System of Medicine) ISMs available in the state level and more pertinent in the districts.  Then utilization for public health goals is minimal.  The utilization of their indigenous curative care services is also minimal.  Their integration with the public health system is yet to be perceived. The bottle neck is not their willingness.  The members individually and as a department welcomes such role allocation.  However the administrative unification at the district level and the programmatic synergy at the level of programme design have not been planned for.
Training:
Training programmes are few and are driven exclusively by the vertical health programmes of the day, largely funded from external donors or the central government.  As a result whatever trainings are taking place are arbitrary in choice of trainees and fragmented as strategy.  Most training programmes are of one or two days and relate to a single disease and an immediate campaign for example a one day leprosy training or two days on HIV family counseling or one day on blindness control and so on.  Some persons have received many such training programmes in diverse area while some have received none.  Then again the MPHW (F) had a special round of training in Reproductive and Child Health(RCH). The vertical orientation of training leads to closely associated work of other diseases not being taught even in much longer capability building trainings.  Thus e.g. the supervisors are trained on blood smear examination for malarial parasites but doing a differential count on the same slide would not be emphasized.

Almost no training is based on building competencies to attain a level of clinical service in a given facility.  We therefore, have a situation where there is a perception with senior officials that the system is being flooded with training programmes  Yet the system can not guarantee that in such centres or PHCs or CHCs of a given district, the level of knowledge and skills needed is now available.  It may not even be able to state, faculty wise what level of skill building has been achieved and what are the gaps.  All these problems can be said to be true of Information Education Communication(IEC )also.
Structural Issues:
Governance:
It is not adequate to locate all problems only at the administrative level.  Some of the key administrative decisions are often taken at the political level. Of these, transfers, promotions and purchases, which are purely administrative activities have in practice become central areas of political decision making.
The policy frame works for the state remain weak.  Most current practices in administration are inherited, having been handed down as traditional practices, rather than having been shaped by active policy frameworks that guide decision making.  What policy initiatives have been taken remain weak in implementation.  For example, the essential drug list is adopted but purchases have not been guided by it. Patients are facing great problem because of high cost of drugs which they are compelled to purchase
Another illustration relates to senior appointments and tenure.  If a policy has to be implemented then a capable person or team must be put in place, monitored, allowed the time frame for that person to show results and the person must be changed if he/she fails to deliver.  This requires a clear transparent system of senior appointments, a secure tenure, a clear set of goals and mandate for the person to achieve and periodic review of the same.  We note that in contrast to this ideal all incumbent officers many of them are holding their posts in an officiating capacity.  Appointments become a prerogative of power and influence.  There is no surety of tenure.  Administrative arbitrariness in such areas are to be recognized as indicators of poor performance.
Significantly even recruitments that are to take place on regular bnasis are not taking place.  Fesh recruitments have been, therefore, only contractual, even where there are vacant posts.  This is again an issue of governance. The problem is that there is a cynicism about policy making itself.  There is a feeling, often justified by experience as with essential drugs  list that any thing can be passed as policy statement without any binding on its implementation.
Normally the ministry would lay down policy and the directorate would be answerable for its implementation.  The ministry would be the main vehicle of ensuring accountability and transparency of the directorate and be answerable to the legislature for it.  The creation of a state health society is meant to facilitate not weaken this relationship.  However, when the separation between governance and implementation is lost and the ministry itself is responsible for implementation, as in the current nature of the state health society, or when the ministry is unable to ensure policy based implementation in core administrative areas, then health sector reform goes  beyond the administrative realm to that of the reform of governance.  One would then have to look to the legislature, the judiciary and institutions of civil society to ensure accountability.  The question we pose is that in the core administrative areas – tenure, transfers, promotions, purchases and transparaency is it a technical and managerial failure or a failure of governance?  If it is an inability to formulate a transfer and promotion policy or organize a system of purchases then is it a technical and managerial questions?.  If not, then,it is a failure of governance.
State Level Work Organisation:
Annexure--IV
The inability to de-concentrate powers and responsibilities at this level is a key problem and may be the main reason for being unable to keep to project schedules.  The experiences of other states may be helpful in this regard. A related diversion is the need or professionalization at the state leadership level.  Though they have very relevant practical experience, professional training in public health management, health policy and in hospital administration has been weak.  Epidemiology is seen as a separate specialty area – not as something basic to health planning and few are conversant with its methods.  Administration would be perceived as nothing more than knowing the rules and common sense.  There have been serious efforts in improving this situation by training inputs, but these are minimal and for this level of leadership rather too late.  A medical administrative state cadre may be suggested.  Even in relative areas of pure management and administration like infrastructure development and purchases and logistics, the system has not made use of qualified management skills, which are easily available on the market.
Decentralization:
Yet another major issue of decentralization of powers to districts.  Currently all district officers perceive districts as having very limited powers – in all of the above aspects of administration as well as in training and programme planning.  Indeed for the main post they are only implementing agencies for national health programmes and medico- legal work.  Their own terms of selection, transfer and monitoring have all the same organizational and motivational problems common to other sections and it seriously compromises their work out put.  Thus while decentralization of powers and finances is essential, it needs to be born in the context of these key administrative reforms being carried out.
Currently elected panchayats have a negligible role in the health secor and even in this the support and programme design needed for them to be effective is not available.
Financing of Health Care:
Financing of health care is an important issue and that budgetary allocation on each facility and workforce relate to out comes.  Also that what is adequate utilization or wasteful relates to amount of investment that has gone into it.  These financial matters should also become the agenda.
Mapping the private sector and exploring its possibility of synergy with the public health system and developing a policy framework for its growth and regulation are yet  issues that need to be addressed.
Regulating Private Hospitals and Nursing Homes:
Mapping the private sector and exploring its possibility of synergy with the public health system and developing a policy framework for its growth and regulation are yet  issues that need to be addressed .Owing to the poor health delivery system in the state , the public sector in the state,there is a mushroom growth of private hospitals and nursing homes. Some of them indulge into a variety of malpractices. There is an urgent need for regulating private services,both to protect the consumers and contain costs. A system of accredition can be thought of as a mechanism to regulate the private health providers.
It is recommended that a committee with Health Minister as the Chairperson and some senior medical officers of the state and representatives of the private health providers be constituted to evolve this mechanism.
Urban Health is another major area which needs more attention.  There is already a realization that health care for the urban poor and public health programmes in the urban context is grossly inadequate and there is an urgent need to develop viable cost effective models of health care delivery.
Functional states and design of specific health programmes needs to be examined.  These are closely related to workforce issues and allow considerable scope for rationalization.  Such programmes include the various national disease control programmes, the reproductive and child health programmes and the strategies of epidemic management.
Current Information,Education Communication (IEC) strategy needs to be examined; one of the most important dimensions of public health strategy.  This area needs to be developed in a more creative way.
The services which are supposed to be delivered  by Health Sub Centers, PHCs and CHCs are to be as per the latest laid down norms.

Recommendations
I.       Adequacy of facilities:
Ø  Increasing Numbers of Peripheral Health Facilities.
Ø  Increasing Health Sub Centers to ensure sub centers as per population norms i.e. one sub centre for every 5000 population
Rural population of Haryana is 1,50,29,989.  So 3005 centers are required.
We have only 2433 Sub Centers.  We need 572 Sub Centre more.  One male and one female health workers are required for each Health Sub Centre.  So we need 3005 male MHW and 3005 Female MHW. We have 425 Male MHW and 1909 Female MHW.  The gap is very disturbing For 2433 Sub Centers even we need 2008 Male MHW and 524 Female MHW workers.
According to latest norms one Female MPHW is added for each Health Sub Centre.  Hence we need 2433  Female MHW in addition to earlier requirements.
Ø  Increasing PHCs to ensure that there is a PHC on every 30,000 population as per the norms.  There are 411 PHCs.  We need 509 PHCs.  Hence 98 more PHCs are needed along with the staff and other infrastructure required.
Ø  Increase peripheral health facilities in urban centers i.e. create a comprehensive urban health plan which includes a network of urban health centers.
Ø  Increase number of CHCs so as to confirm to the population norms: One CHC for 80,000 population because density of population is higher in Haryana or at the most for 1,00,000 population.  Rural population is 1,50,29,989.  So we need 150 CHCs in total.  We have 87 CHCs at present.  We need 63 more CHC salon with the infrastructure and human resource
Ø          Adoption of minimum norms of service delivery and provisioning for it:  One of the most important recommendations of the HARC is the adaptation of recommended norms on service delivery for each facility- the health Sub Centre, the PHC, the CHC and the civil and district hospitals.  These norms may be widely disseminated and health sector planners must be informed about the same. (Annexure V).
II.    Problem of Location of these Facilities:
1. Block level mapping (GIS based):  It is required to prepare block level maps showing all villages with existing Health Sub Centers and PHCs in all blocks as well as demarcating various sections and sectors according to population norms Based on this to search out ideal locations for Health Sub Centres and PHCs and compare this to where they are currently located.  This may be most efficiently done on GIS based software created for this purpose.
 2. Optimum Location of These Facilities:  This would consider geographical optimum as also take into account economic activity, like the village weekly market and common bus stand for 5-6 villages , locate the centre in coherence with such activity so as to make it easier and more likely for people to access the Sub Centre or PHC or CHC .  This may be included as a parameter in the GIS data base.  This data base may also reflect location preferences with a quick stakeholder analysis.
   3. Reallocation Possibilities: Based on the above inputs decision is to be taken on location at first for all facilities where Government constructions are needed like in Health Sub Centres without buildings, sectors without PHCs, v/s sectors with PHCs operating from rented buildings.  Where necessary infrastructure has already been constructed these facilities may be classified into those that are by location completely unusable; those that may be continue to be used unless there are alternate uses for the current building and funds to build one at ideal location, and a third category where current location of facilities is acceptable.  Based on this a plan of construction priority for each block may be drawn up.
4.  Constructions Only According to Plans:  Once such a plan is drawn up for each block funds may be sought from internal budgetary mechanisms and from external agencies, insisting all the while that all constructions must be in accordance with the plan.  The approval of designs of the buildings and the construction would be done at the district level under approval from the empowered body which is made at the state level to look at purchases, maintenance, and infrastructure development.
5. No 100 Bed Hospitals: in any block or district should be built till all district hospitals and all CHCs staffed and functional as envisaged.
III. Restructuring Staffing Patterns, Redefining Jobs and Adequacy of Manpower
Recalculating Manpower Gaps: Gaps in staffing should be re-calculated after planning for multi-skilling and redistribution of existing staff such that there are no redundant manpower.
Two Female MPWs in each Sub Centre:  Sub Centers may plan for two female MPHWs and one male MPHW.  The job description and work load of the MPHW (F) needs to be lessened and made realistic except for institutional delivery and 1U CD insertion, every task done by women can be done by men also.  When there will be two female MPW, the number of population for female will become half which will help in quality service.
Multi skilling all PHC Para medicals:  The PHC staffing pattern needs restructuring to ensure utilization of man power and better functioning of the facility.  PHCs may plan for having three or four male multi skilled employees with a male multi skilled supervisor and three or four female multi skilled workers and a female multi skilled supervisor.  There would also be two medical officers one male (  and one female – MBBS  or Ayush MO) in every PHC.  These multi skilled workers must be skilled in dressing, drug dispensation (pharmacists task) and first contact curative care and in basic laboratory package as well as in RCH.  Between them they should be able to keep the PHC functional for 24 hrs, should provide institutional delivery and the other services as proposed in the service delivery norms.  After this multi skilling and revision of job descriptions, cadre restructuring may follow this.  No one is to be dropped unless one is not willing for multi - skilling.  New recruitments should be into the multi skilled category and many existing cadres would die away.  Some like staff nurse would function as multi skilled staff when posted in PHC but can play the role of staff nurse when posted in CHC and district hospitals.  It can be said that such retraining and re deployment would solve a substantial part of the manpower  vacancy problem.  Each PHC may also have two staff   personnel at class IV qualifications. 
Rationalization of Deployment of Medical Doctors at the PHC level:
Ø  Differentiated strategy according to difficulty levels:  The ideal would be two medical officers at every PHC (as in Tamil Nadu), preferably one lady doctor. The number of posts need to be increased as per the requirement. The vacant jobs should be advertised immediately and filled. However, this may not immediately be realized due to shortage of potential recruits and the difficulty in finding even one medical officer per remote area.  Therefore, it can be suggested that PHCs be categorized into most difficult, difficult and easy and a different strategy be adopted for each.The incentives in form of- i) increase in rural health allowance to Rs 2500 per month and special pay package for categorized PHCs ranging from 5000-8000 per month or the doctors be allowed private practice after duty hours as in Rajasthan.
Ø  24 hour Multi skilled Paramedical Based Services in all PHCs:  It can be recommended that in all PHCs irrespective of category, 24 hour service with emphasis on institutional delivery be insisted on by multi-skilling and deploying para medicals.  The multi skilled paramedical worker should also be trained in emergency care management at Primary level.  It can be emphasized that by paramedical worker we mean the current MPWs or Pharmacists or staff nurses currently in service with further training inputs and not the legitimization of under qualified allopathic practice that also goes by the name of paramedical course.  The role of doctor in the PHC would be to provide leadership and on the job training and a referral back up for this team.  Where a doctor is resident, the doctor is available on call 24 hrs to back up this team.
Ø  Daily Visits by CHC Based Doctors for Most Difficult PHCs:
Where no medical doctors are available currently, where access is a problem and accommodation facilities are low (category C), even as efforts are made to fill these posts, the backing up is done by daily visits and in a few distant PHCs two or three visits per week of a medical doctor from the respective CHCs.  The doctor would be required to be available during working hours and his stay at PHC would be insisted on only if adequate accommodation and security arrangements, governmental or rental are available.  Even in this, exemption may be given for special reasons as long as stay in nearby block town as part of the CHC team and daily attendance is regular.  Family accommodation at the CHC would be easier to organize.  In other words we should not insist on medical doctors staying in PHCs designated category C – most difficult (one considers that the above approach with mobile doctors but fixed facilities may be more cost effective than mobile hospitals when combined with the use of multi skilled para medicals.

Ø  Strengthening BAMS Doctors  Role While Keeping Medical Officers Option Open:

The use of medical officers with BAMS (Ayurvedic Scheme) to fill up vacancies where no medical officers are currently available is welcome.  However all the service issues discussed earlier about MBBS doctors equally affect functionality.  More over currently they would be unable to deliver the notified services at the PHC level and special training would be needed to close the gaps.  The post of the allopathic doctor should be retained and the search to fill this post should continues with offer of better incentives. Also if training, transfer and promotion policies are put in place, these vacancies would certainly be much less.  By integrating ISM sector with the allopathic sector we may also approximate the ideal of two medical officers per PHC much faster and have less underutilized manpower in our hands.
The CHCs be Strengthened By:
Ø  Appointment of six Medical Officers at least.
Four of these  at least should be specialist  (physician, pediatrician, surgeon, gynecologist) mix..  If there are a number of PHCs not having doctors to be looked after with visits, the number posted here may increase further?  One Anesthetist must also be posted in every CHC otherwise the other specialists will become defunct.  The four medical officers norm is sub critical.
Ø  Adequate Multi Skilled Male and Female Paramedical Staff:
Who can manage the necessary support work and multi skilled imaging technicians who can also manage X-rays, USG and ECG too?  In addition there would be a unskilled worker category of undifferentiated, inter changeable class IV functioneries- chaukidar, peon, sweeper, waterman – all rolled  into one.  Six qualified staff nurses, two qualified laboratory technicians and an optometrist are also a must at this level.
Ø  Redesignating the Block Extension Educator:
The block level extension educator may be renamed the block senior paramedical supervisor and be responsible for capability building, IEC and supervision of sector supervisors.
Adequate Clerical and Accounting Staff, at least two, be provided to every CHC along with computer and printers.
IV.  Rationalisation of Work Allocation and Approaches to Improve Outreach:
 In Addition to the above measures, Improving Outreach Requires:
Ø  Reorganisation of MPW Work Schedule:
MPWs may be required to tour for three days a week, instead of the present one or two days a week.  One day a week should be devoted to review and drawing supplies from PHCs.  The remaining two days a week should be devoted to clinical work and other services provided at Sub Centre.  These two days are fixed and her clienteles should know that he/she is available there in her headquarters on these two days.  In each field visit day, he/she would visit a specified number of houses and hold meetings with one of the four identified local groups.  Once a month he/she should attend a Block Level Review and Training.  If there are two MPWs posted their two days at the headquarters may be fixed in such a way  that the Sub-Centre is open on four previously specified days every week, which is better than the current one day a week or so.
Revised MPHW Job Description:
An MPHW’s job description for both male and female worker should be
·         Immunization – children and pregnant women largely at the village visit and camps but supplemented by immunization at the sub centre.
·         Antenatal care and post partum care at sub centre, with visits to these pregnant women (unable/unwilling to come).
·         Motivation and facilitation for all methods of contraception
·         Training and support to local women health committees and Mahila Saksharta Samooh activists.
·         Regular house visits, such that every house hold is visited once every 15 days or one month) for a set of “case detection, follow up and counseling activities” along with first contact curative care where required. (this include all national programmes related activities).
·         Focal group discussions/health education sessions/health camps during village visits.
·         Curative care during field visits on three days and at Sub Centre on two days.
·         Response to epidemic using a graded epidemic response protocol.  In addition to the above male worker would have the following tasks:
·         Addressing male youth on adolescent problems and STDs control.
·         Interaction with Panchayats, SKS, and with local leaders for facilitation of health programmes.
·         In addition to the above female MPHWs shall have the following tasks:
·         Assistance at childbirth
·         1UCD insertion
·         Addressing adolescent girls on health problems.
Out Reach Camps:
As a rule health camps are beset with problems.  They are wasteful of resources, they disturb routine activity.  They alter priorities of the persons and problems attended to and they create a high visibility for low priority and inadequate activities mostly symptomatic or even irrational curative care for trivial illness.  However in villages or clusters of villages where one or other service has less than 50% coverage or there is a large number of persons to be reached, a health camp which reduces and brings down to a manageable level the burden of unfinished service delivery would be welcome.  Health camps therefore, should be preceded and driven by health needs identified by MPHWs (Panchayats or Mahila Saksharta Samooh or SKS) rather than programme targets to be met above.  Thus a blindness treatment camp preceded by a careful identification of those needy and driven by such needs with a carefully planned follow up, or an immunization camp for measles where a survey shows that over half the children have not received it, is much more useful than declaring a series of camps first and then trying to mobilize the clientele for it.
V.     Rationalisation of Drugs and Consumables Supply:
·         The essential Drug List:
The essential drug list needs to be implemented.  In particular the expanded list of drugs adopted for Health Sub Centre and PHCs has to become available to them at once.  This is to be accompanied by training on standard treatment guidelines and drug formulary for the expanded list. The essential drug list may also incorporate all consumables and minor equipment (frequently replaceable).  A quick process of appeal can be built in where a CMO or programme director appeals for being permitted to purchase a drug outside the list, but this must be done with prior permission and with due process. Up to 10% of the budget may go to such outside the list purchases.  Any violation of the drug list should invite disciplinary action or else it would be difficult to get a meaningful drug policy into place.
Distribution:  Systems  where pharmaceuticals, consumables and equipment will reach  from district level warehouses to peripheral facilities in a routine manner are essential.  A number of equipment that MPWs use requires frequent replacements like BP apparatus and thermometer and they should also be therefore, a part of consumables management.  The drug and supplies policy should reflect this.  It can be recommended that a distribution system based on the “PASS Book” like in Tamil Nadu is urgently needed so that distribution can be all year around and responsive to patterns of usages.  In this system each facility has a passbook, which reflects the amount of drugs in stock.  When the stock falls to below three months usage, a level fixed at the district level for each drug then the facility immediately indents for the drug to the district warehouse which in turn supplies the drug to the PHC in the same week.  When the district stock falls below a three months supply an order is sent off the next day and within a month the item would reach the concerned district warehouse.
·         Procurement
We recommend that the pre-qualification of suppliers and the price negotiation be done at the state level by an empowered body in a a transparent and open manner.  When the district warehouse stock falls below its three-month figure then the same drug is immediately procured at approved rates.  Therefore, all subsequent districts orders are through this empowered body and supplies would be sent directly to the districts.  This body would arrange for quality testing of drugs also.
·         Drug Policy
All of the above should be incorporated in a separate drug and consumables policy.  The adoption of such a drugs and consumables policy for the state is another urgently required policy measure.
VI.  RATIONALISATION OF EQUIPMENT-PROCUREMENT AND UTILISATION
  • Smaller low cost equipment that is frequently replaceable must be dealt with as for consumables.
  • Larger equipment, which is costlier and requires training to make operational, needs to be purchased and deployed only as part of block and district level plans linked to service quality deliverables.  This would ensure that there is no mismatch between equipment purchase and infrastructure, between equipment and skilled manpower available, between equipment and related consumables supply and that the purchase of equipment is linked to quality  improvements in the package of services offered at this level.
  • Purchase can have the same policy of pre-qualification and price negotiation at the state level with districts while placing orders.  The same empowered body which implements drug and supplies procurement and distribution may undertake all equipment purchase.  Further such a body would ensure that adequate arrangements are made for maintenance and such arrangements are renewed.
VII.           INFRASTRUCTURE ARRANGEMENTS
  • There is an ongoing effort to build 30 bedded hospitals with a modern operation theatre in every designated CHC.  This is a welcome effort and deserves to be strengthened.  At the level of the block ensuring bed occupancy of these 30 beds is itself a challenge.  Therefore, the attempt to take on 100 bed rural hospitals is ill advised and would be diverting funds away from this basic goal which is far from complete.
  • Given the large gap in infrastructure our recommendation is that a plan be drawn up for closing the gaps prioritizing sector PHCs and CHCs and completely integrating with ISM infrastructure. Sub-centres would be only next in priority and institutional delivery in sub-centres and need not be insisted on at this stage.  Once the plan is drawn up one set of blocks be prioritized and the gap closed in that set of blocks along with closing equipment and manpower gaps before moving to the next set of blocks.  Thereby the entire infrastructure requirements for the state would be met over a five year period  without having to face the gross under utilization of infrastructure as is currently faced.  If there are financial constraints to infrastructure development the evidence of good utilisation would help to overcome them.  Currently utilization is so poor that both state finance departments and external donors feel justified in shying away from infrastructure investments.  This coordinated development of infrastructure is the heart of the Enhance Quality In Primary Health Centres(EQUIP) programme’s rationale.
  • Attention may be given to closing the gaps regarding water supply and power supply and to ensuring that separate toilets for staff as well as bathing facilities for men and women are also in place in each of the PHC and CHC structures.  Inadequately recognized priority areas are waste disposal systems, drainage and sewerage all of which needs to be put into place in all PHCs and CHCs.
  • Telephones are one of the most immediately remediable problems and same urgency needs to be given to this issue. 
  • There is much effort at computerization at state level and providing computers and web-access with training to use this would enhance monitoring and support capabilities tremendously.  It should be possible to prioritise this and within a finite time frame achieve this capability at least for PHCs and CHCs and later for Health Sub Centre(HSCs) as well.  Computerisation in the present day is also a culture that may be encouraged.
VIII.        SERVICE CONDITIONS
Transfer; Promotion; Financial burdens; Personal Security, Accommodation for Staff
  • Transfer Policy
A clear policy on transfer is well-perceived and long overdue reform measure.  This is needed for all categories of staff but particularly for the male and female multipurpose workers and their supervisors and the medical staff.  A committee composed of some senior officials, some motivated workers identified by the department and some representatives of the workers service associations should evolve such a policy that is considered fair, transparent and easy to implement at the earliest.
The following principles should be considered while developing the transfer policy:
ü  Pressure for transfers would be reduced by making MPW selection into a block level cadre and other category selection including medical officers, other than Class-I officers into a district level cadre.
ü  The authority for the transfer shall be a district and state level transfer tribunals.  The tribunal may be made up of a three-person board chaired by the Chief Medical and Health Officer of the district, with one of the board members appointed by the District Collector and another by the Employees Association.
ü  A roster of request for transfer should be maintained.  Transfer shall be considered in that seniority.  Within the same transfer seniority shall prevail.
ü  All cadres may apply for transfer stating their preferred choices.
ü  All postings in the district shall be classified into very difficult (C) and medium difficult (B) and choice postings(A).  Every staff shall be required to serve roughly equal time in all these levels of difficulty.
ü  After ten years in one area transfer is mandatory as also a matter of right, but can be according to choice if the chosen post is vacant.  Transfer out of a difficult area would not be mandatory but would be an employee’s right if the required period of service has been given.
ü  Mutual transfers shall be allowed but without contradicting any of the above clauses.
ü  Persons in the last ten years of service may be exempted from mandatory transfer.
ü  All promotions may be considered only after five years in difficult posting or ten years in medium posting is completed.
  • Promotion Policy for Para medicals
ü  Regular Prompt Promotion with Six Months Pre-Promotion Training: Prompt promotion of MPHWs to sector supervisors may be ensured.  Before they take up the task as sector supervisors both MPHWs male and female may undertake a six-month training programme (?Currently male supervisors do not have to undergo this training though women supervisors have to).  There is a large backlog and urgency needs to be given to prompt implementation of these promotions.
ü  Fast-Track Promotion: We also recommend an additional system in which a portion of total Lady Health Visitor(LHV) and male sector supervisor posts (25%) may be reserved for promoting MPHWs on the basis of their willingness to serve in difficult areas if they had not done so in the past, and an examination of their skills and knowledge after a minimum period of service eg seven years of service.
We expect that this will motivate some enthusiastic functionaries to volunteer to serve in more difficult areas.  If those promoted are not able to fulfil their commitment and get transferred to non-difficult areas before fulfilling their 5 year commitment, their appointment as LHV/Sector supervisor will be revoked and they will be reinstated as MPHWs.
For those MPHWs already in difficult areas, a promotion in this channel may induce them to continue their services in these areas.
We understand that in difficult areas multiskilled sector supervisors would have to play a major role in running 24 hour services at sector level (see along with recommendation on multi-skilling in next sections).  In such a context such a parallel channel where some younger more dynamic persons become available at the supervisor grade would be useful to initiate this process.
ü  Redesignation of the Block Extension Educator(BEE); The Block extension educator does not do block extension education and may be renamed block senior paramedical supervisor.  He would have a special responsibility in training, capability building, IEC and supervision.  This promotion should be seniority cum merit promotion based on adequate testing of training capability from within the cadre of all sector supervisors who have completed a certain number of years.
ü  One Time Bound Seniority Based Promotion for All: For all other service categories promotions and benefits there shall be one time-bound seniority based promotion from selection cadre to senior cadre.
Promotion Policy and Career Plan For Medical Officers
            Negative attitudes to the service and to their work amongst medical officers must be recognized to be as a failure to understand and care for this cadre and due to poor structuring of health systems – not “lazily” blamed on the medical officers.  The lack of transfer policy and frank discrimination in transfers is one important reason for demoralization.  The lack of promotion avenues is another.  For doctors other than promotions the ability to enhance their skills, their prestige within the profession, their prestige in society and their contribution to science are all important motivational aspects that need to be provided for.  Their inability to make a career plan where they can enhance clinical skills or get other promotional or career opportunities later is a problem.  The system would reap rich benefits if it saw the desire for career advancement of the doctors as an opportunity instead of as a problem.

The key recommendation on promotions for doctors are:
ü  Contractual appointments must be seen as adhoc arrangements.  Regular appointments may remain the mainstay of the workforce.
ü  Timely, time bound promotions to senior grades and specialist grades needs to be ensured.
ü  Skill retention for specialists. The feeling of professional dissatisfaction may be higher especially in postgraduates serving as medical officers and needs to be addressed through better professional opportunities.  Every postgraduate could be linked to CHCs, which they attend on periodic occasions for providing specialist services.  Thus a surgeon should be able to perform operations on certain days and so on.  And they should be able to send for investigations at higher centres directly and have access to drugs related to their field of specialization, which normally we would not expect a PHC doctor to handle and so on.
ü  Choice of stream for Class-I Officers.  After ten years of service when they enter class – I officer status the doctors may be given a choice between a clinical stream (if necessary of a district cadre) or a state level administrative cadre with opportunities for advancement professionally in both these streams.
ü  Financial Burdens of MPHWs : The department should provide for adequate allowance to MPHWs to carry out routine paper work.  Payments should be prompt and be made on half-yearly or annual basis.
Also, unfair reductions and false statements on expenses made on travel and other programme purposes should be eliminated.  The assistance cell (discussed later) should be available for confidential complaints in this regard.
ü  Personal security: Creating a Women Employees Assistance Cell at District Level
This must be recognized as an issue for MPW females.  The Supreme Court has already laid down the procedures under the VISAKA guidelines and these may be publicized and implemented.
We also recommend a Women Employees Assistance Cell in all districts that will provide legal aid, counseling and protection and some degree of grievance redressal particularly to the MPHW female workers.  The WEAC should meet every quarter and have a confidential postal access.  It should take up all issues confidentially and in non-confrontational manner.  It should not hesitate to recommends firm administrative or legal action where necessary, with adequate publicity for it to act as a deterrent.  The WEAC should be headed by a woman outside the health department – with some experience of work on women’s issues.  The WEAC should be nominated by the District Collector in consultation with the Chief Medical Officer.
ü  Accommodation
Block Level-Government Housing Plan: All accommodation for medical staff at CHC level should be part of a government housing development plan common to all government departments so that adequate supporting infrastructure and facilities can be developed.  This can be done with private partnerships, not only to speed implementation, but also to bring in investment.  The accommodation so provided should be adequate for all staff.  Work could start with prioritization of more difficult blocks so as to speed up development there.
Sector Level-Category-wise Priorities: All PHCs in medium category difficulty should be prioritized for building government accommodation, for all the staff in a cost effective manner.  This would act as an incentive for staff to work there.  In “most difficult” category areas accommodation may be planned for para medical staff as a priority at this stage.
Sub-Centre Buildings: Sub-centre buildings may not be seen as a priority except where the complete block level planning is completed.  It is best to prioritise those Sub-centres where there are no rooms available on rent or alternate building available for developing infrastructure then only move to other centres.  Since institutional delivery is not being insisted on at HSC level, rented accommodation with a store and a consultation/immunization room available and paid for by the government should be adequate for most HSCs in the immediate period.  When a new building is undertaken, the current design of MPW accommodation cum HSC facility may be continued even though institutional delivery is not insisted on as this space has other uses to merit its retention.  Where needed and when the systems of referral have developed it may be easily be designated for institutional deliveries.
IX.  LABORATORY SERVICES
  • Multi skilled Cadre for PHCs: Since the current number of laboratory technicians is adequate only to man the CHCs, a greater effort should be made on multi-skilling other cadre to undertake this work at the sector level.  Over a few years every support staff should have these basic skills.
  • Basic Set of Tests for PHC:  The basic laboratory set of tests provided at the PHC must include blood haemoglobin estimation, total count, differential counts, bleeding time and clotting time, blood smear examination for parasites, urine examination for albumin, sugar, ketones, bile salts and pigments, microscopy of urine, sputum acid fast microscopy, grams staining of sputum, csf, stool microscopic examination for ova and cysts and hanging drop examination of stools.  The sickling test may also be considered.  All these tests require very basic skills and are easily taught.  The most difficult of these is the BSE (blood smear examination) for malarial parasite and sputum for AFB  but given that multi-skilling in this is already accepted, ability to train in this wider range of tests should not be considered a problem.
  • Training Approach:  This set of tests can be taught to a team member – primarily by the medical officer.  Training programmes at the district level would only supplement this.  The medical officer would only need a one week package to be refreshed on this if there is a good text to follow along with proper teaching materials organized well.  Charts and guidebooks that both doctors and multi-skilled staff can refer to along with pictures of microscopic appearances should also be available in every centre and their absence is a serious remediable problem.
  • CHC tests as Per Standard Treatment Guidelines:  The set of tests to be available in a CHC have been described as part of the state’s standard treatment guidelines and service delivery norms should be able to conduct the following diagnostics:. Broadly the CHC should be able to conduct the following diagnostics:
ü  Basic blood biochemistry, and microscopic studies with grams stain, cerebrospinal, pleural, peritoneal fluid examination.  Immunological testing esp. for hepatitis, typhoid, AIDS, and syphilis
ü  Basic imaging: X-ray, ECG and ultrasound be the norm for all CHCs.
ü  Every CHC should also have the capability to take and send samples for microbiological cultures and histo-pathological studies at the district level where relevant.
  • Upgraded Laboratory Technicians at CHC: The qualified laboratory technician at the CHC level should be upgraded to provide this much larger package of tests then what is currently available.  Where still gaps remain public private partnerships to close these gaps may be prioritized.  The laboratory technicians and the X-ray technicians should work under the supervision and guidance and quality control of a suitable district level officer in addition to the block medical officer.
  • Health Sub-Centre Level Tests: At the HSC level urine testing for albumen and sugar and blood testing for hemoglobin should be implemented.  In addition it should be possible to train a cadre of NGOs and “trainers of ASHA programmes” and male MPHWs to do Blood smear examination (BSEs) and sputum AFB testing along with the above. Thus reducing reporting time of blood smears to less than 24 hours, for all habitations.  This would require investment by the government in a microscope and a basic kit and a piece rate payment arrangement by which these essentially private service providers can be remunerated for diagnostics done for  the public system.
X.     REFERRAL SYSTEM
§  Defining Referral Needs
The importance of a referral system can not be over emphasized.  Broadly, between the PHC and the CHC, or between the CHC and the district hospital, the following reasons necessitate the need for a good referral system:
a.       For establishing the diagnosis for which laboratory investigation not available at the PHC/CHC are needed.
b.      For establishing the diagnosis for which a second opinion or an expert opinion not available in the PHC/CHC is needed.
c.       For management of case whose diagnosis is known and infrastructure, staff, equipment is adequate but for whom drugs are available only at the next level e.g. epilepsy.
d.      For management of a case whose diagnosis is known but where a quality of equipment or infrastructure or staff is needed which is not available in the PHC – e.g. all in-hospital care or surgical care etc.
Ø  Under condition a & b, referral is a one time event and with a good quality, prompt feedback the case can be further managed at the PHC level.  This referral therefore, enhances he quantity and quality of services provided by the PHC.  Condition c is avoidable and requires that the drugs be available at the PHC.  The new essential drug list has a number of drugs included in the primary health centre list so as to avoid such referrals altogether and if needed this may be supplemented by allowing special indents.
Ø  Condition “d” may occur as an emergency or in routine out patient circumstances.  Some of these cases would need to be followed up at the higher level for all time to come.  But many would be able to be sent back for follow up to the primary level once the acute crisis is over.  Availability of this referral enhances the credibility of the PHC.
§  Designing Effective Feedback in a Referral System
We can thus see that most of the above referral purposes need a referral system, the heart of which is the feedback arrangement to the primary level.  If such a system is well in place the capabilities of the PHC and the medical officer there are dramatically increased.  In our situation of illiteracy and low schooling and mystification of medial practice sending a note back with the patient is not a reliable, accountable or effective referral system.  In addition to sending the note back with the patient the feedback data on referred patients, whether it be expert opinion, or laboratory investigation, or instructions for follow up should be transmitted in writing through the health system and available for verification.  Eventually this feedback should be electronically transferred through Web and Will systems.
§ Block Level Ambulance Services
A good transporatation system is essential for any referral system to function properly.  It is suggested that in addition to the ambulance with the CHC a block level ambulance service be developed in partnership with local community organizations to transport patients and this be tied to the referral systems.  It is also essential to construct a referral system between HSC and PHC and between ASHA and PHC based on similar principles of specifying situations that need referral and arranging for a strong feedback mechanism.  Good communication between different tiers is needed as well and this should be linked to the ambulance service.
§  Referral Fund with Panchayats:  The referral fund currently placed at the disposal of panchayats may be operationalised through ASHA and with links to the above mentioned ambulance system.  The ASHA should be authorized to arrange the required funds for referring needy patients and even  accompanying patients to PHC and CHC especially for certain categories of illness like high risk pregnancy or life threatening emergencies and so on.
XI.  INTEGRATION WITH INDIGENOUS SYSTEMS OF MEDICINE
  • Need to Integrate at Level of Public Health System:  Integration of the ISM structure with the mainstream public health services is desirable for a number of reasons.  There is a substantial investment entailed in these systems.  Utilisation is however extremely low both in terms of utilization ISM services and in terms of it sub-serving public health goals.  By integrating the ISM network with the public health programmes a substantial income in outcomes can be expected of little extra cost.
  • Defining ISM Package of Services at Each Level  Integration requires as a first step the definition of what package of services each category of personnel and facility in the ISMs would provide.
  • Multi skilling ISM Personnel for Public Health Functions:  Integration requires, based on the above, a multi-skilling of personnel to serve new roles, new job descriptions and administrative changes to facilitate such synergy.  It also requires adequate policies of transfers and promotions and skill up gradation so that they too do not face the de motivational factors that the mainstream is already seized with.
  • Sharing Infrastructure: If either the ISM facility or the mainstream sector PHC does not have adequate infrastructure, a PHC building or the existing infrastructure may be shared.  Thus in working out areas of coverage priority be given to closing the gap between number of sectors and the number of PHCs.  We note that if there is a synergistic deployment of the two, the current gap between number of sectors and the number of PHCs, largest gap in the system as would be adequately closed
  • Making a Common District and Block Public Health Plan:  At the district level the district Ayurvedic officer serve as part of the health planning committee and this plan is integrated as a subset under the district health plan of the CHMO’s office and the district health society.  At the block level coordination is by the BMO.  At the sector level ISM facilities may be asked to perform public health tasks in a section allotted to them also.

XII.            TRAINING :The goal of the training policy shall be to ensure that all the requisite skills to attain a specific quality of care for a given facility becomes available at that level.  This is true for para-medicals as well as for medical officers.
To achieve this goal we recommend an in-service training package with following features:
  • For Para medicals : Multi skilling
Ø  Minimum Periodic Re-training: The training policy must specify that evry two years at least 15 days of training per MPW and health supervisor (male and female) must be received
Ø  Training Roster: A roster of all MPWs and health supervisors should be maintained  at the block and district level just for this purpose denoting last training attended, topics and number of days of training in each.  The block medical officers may coordinate with district training centre to see that all their health workers have received the mandatory training.
Ø  Syllabus: The syllabus for it should be built up to include:
Ø  Changes in heath programme guidelines of national health programmes – best addressed through two day sensitization programmes, whenever such a change is made.
Ø  Renewal of care area of their work – RCH programme for MPHWs (at least 15 days) and national programmes for male workers.
Ø  Multi skilling training in which female workers learn more about national programmes and about basic laboratory skills and male workers learn about RCH and adequate levels of basic laboratory skills.
Ø  Adequate training for first contact curative care.
Ø  A modified IEC programme capability with focus on interpersonal and community mobilization skills along with better understanding of a multicultural and ethnically diverse society.
§  On-the Job Training:   The supervisors should be held responsible for on the job training of the health workers and periodic evaluation of knowledge and skills of health workers be used to ensure that they perform this task adequately, as they should be accountable for this in their juniors.  The medical officers must be equipped to evaluate the supervisors on training in most areas and in some areas like basic laboratory services they should be capable of providing the training on the job.
  • Integrate Training Funds: All training funds from various programmes are deployed in such a way that even as the objective of that grant is realized, the training goals the state has set itself is also advanced within that same space.
  • Training Cell to Precede and Prepare for SIHFW:  A training cell for in-service MPWs and supervisors training needs to be constituted in the SIHFW that is constantly doing training needs assessment, training material development, master trainer training of district training centers, supervision of training rosters and training evaluation.
  • For Medical Officers
Continuing Medical Education:  We recommend a Continuing Medical Education scheme for medical doctors to upgrade their knowledge and skills.  This should replace the current practice of upgrading their knowledge through sporadic camps of national disease programmes.  The envisaged CME scheme should also be useful for promotion purpose.  A CME should be pursued as a very useful intervention strategy in health care delivery system.
Minimum Skill-Mix for CHC:  Having defined a minimum package of services at the CHC as essential to meet public health goals one needs to a put in place a road map by which the desirable skill mix needed for delivering such a package of services would become a reality. We make the following suggestions in this regard:
ü  Decide on what skill mix is needed in each CHC and what the gaps are.  The focus is on emergency obstetric care but the skill mix approach need not be confined to this alone.
ü  Draw up a schedule of providing short term trainings so that existing medical officers and specialists fill up the gaps with acquired basic skill sets other than in areas which their primary specialization.  Thus a surgeon may also learn to do Caesarean section or ENT and ophthalmic work, or a physician may learn pediatric functions and so on.
ü  Where gaps still remain one may use public private partnerships to fill up the gaps.
XIII.        STATE AND DISTRICT LEVEL ORGANISATION
  • Promotions and Tenure at the State Level
ü  Prompt and Regular Appointments:  All vacancies must be filled up at the directorate (directors, joint directors, deputy directors, chief medical officers and programme officers at the state level) must be filled up within a period of six months on a regular basis from eligible staff at that level or by promotion, (except those posts that are to be recruited from the outside on a consultancy/contract basis where it could take up to an year).  For programme officers at the district level and block medical officers must be filled up within the same timeframe but in the event of creating a separate administrative cadre where these are entry points they could take longer, up to a year.
ü  Officiating Officers:  In the period between the next regular appointment and the relinquishment of the earlier appointee if an officer must be given temporary charge, then only the senior most officer may qualify for the same.
ü  Security of Tenure:  All posts of CMOs, Directors and BMOs would have a security of three year tenure.  Unless there is gross failure of function certified by a panel they would not be transferred.  They would be set a three year goal for development in their area when they take charge and be reviewed against these goals.
  • Work Allocation and Job descriptions at the state level
ü  Distribution of Work:   The four directors may have work allocations reordered so that the burden on the director of health services is reduced.  This could be partly by passing same of the work to the other three directors. 
ü  A separate Director or Separate Body for Purchases:  Another area of devolution of powers is purchases.  This devolution could be by creating a separate autonomous para-state body to be headed by a non clinical management expert or even outsourced to a management firm to take charge of all purchases and distribution of drugs, consumables, equipment and infrastructural development. 
ü  Another Director for Training, Policy and Planning and IEC: Yet another area of devolution is for capability development and planning this person would also head the state institute of health and family welfare.  Given the nature of the task, this director is best recruited on contract or on deputation from the open market with in house candidates also eligible to apply.
ü  Specific Work Allocation and Powers for Joint Directors: Even after such devolution the director of health services would have a very large but now potentially manageable portfolio, if there is adequate delegation of work to joint directors.  The joint directors, assisted by deputy directors, would be also given a clear charter of work with adequate powers for planning and independent action and placed in charge of specific programmes and sectors where they would have to show results.  Deputy Directors would be the programme officers at the state level as well as three who assist in core administrative issues of the directors.  Their numbers may be decided accordingly.
ü  SHRC and External Inputs for Planning: We feel that this above mix of four promotes internal to the department and two recruits (on contractual/deputation basis or by the para -statal route) from the open market and the mix of skill proposed would give the much needed dynamism that a vibrant public health system needs.  In addition to this or as part of this (integrated with or in conjunction with the SIHFW) formal state civil society partnership  institutions need to be worked up .Planning and innovation requires fresh inputs and insights brought in from the larger academic, professional and activist circles.  Contracting in directors is one avenue of such recruitment.  Building state-civil society partnership institutions like the State Health Resource Centre(SHRC) where motivated persons with their own commitment and initiative can contribute to the state government is another major avenue.
  • Systems for purchases and Infrastructure Development:
The essential drug list and the norms for health services provision adopted by the state would define the minimum drugs, the minimum set of equipment and the minimum infrastructure development needed for that level of care.  The need and challenge of developing a system of purchases is to ensure that the drug and equipment purchase of this matches and parallels the human power and infrastructure available and developing in that facility.  This is not incompatible with decentralization.  On the other hand it is almost a precondition for it.  The human power and expertise needed to select and finalize purchases of a bewildering range of drugs and equipment would just not be available in all districts and cannot be built up without costly redundancies.  But  the current centralized system is inefficient with high degree of mismatches and bottlenecks and sub-optimal in use of scarce financial resources.
The state role is to provide for a separate office if not an institution headed by a management person with experience in procurement and supplies.(ONLY FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT)  Delegating a clinician to this is inappropriate, though close coordination with clinicians would be essential.  Such an office can complete pre-qualification of companies, issues tender documents and negotiate prices and place orders on behalf of chief medical officers for all supplies-drugs, consumable and equipment.  Such collective bargaining can give better prices than if each district head bargained on his own, but the requirement would be of the district.  The further advantage is that by monitoring stock positions on a daily basis and linked with a distribution system the supplies of drugs can be flexible and streamlined to meet the needs of the system.  The key recommendation in this is outsourcing to a management firm or a management head or a para-statal body created for this purpose headed by such a person taken on contract.  This firm has to display its final rates it has secured and show comparisons with other states and public sector units to show that it has been able to get quality at rates comparable to the best deals in the nation.  Quality testing of drugs and Maintenance of equipment both of which have very poor or non-existent arrangement would be taken care of by this.  It should further display the entire process on a website so that it is part of the public domain.

In infrastructure development again this office would provide assistance to the CMO in design specifications, tendering and issueing contracts.  Payments could be made from the CMO0s office under such decentralization.

This is not a new idea.  Broadly this is what the Tamilnadu Medical Supplies Corporation has achieved and it provides consultancy for this.  One may go further and seek with TNMSC or a private management firm a BOT (Build Operate Transfer) agreement building into this agreement indicators not only for building the system but also a planned capability building in the department and eventually transfer of this to a state body.

  • Decentralization and Delegation of Powers to Districts
ü  The Role of Panchayati Raj Institutions:  The study group sees decentralization as a major goal.  Decentralization is necessary to have a health plan that is flexible and responds to local needs.  It is needed as a better system of administration.  It allows for creativity and innovation.  It allows for different rates of growth responsive to human resources available and the quality of leadership provided.  Decentralization is however essentially a political process implying decentralization of governance – as distinct from the mere increase in delegation of  powers to CMOs.  Decentralization of health department functions to panchayats is therefore best done as part of a process of political decentralization which includes increasing powers and financial resources of panchayats as well as with capability building.  In the absence of such political initiative, involvement of panchayats in decision making, planning and programme implementation by placing them in district and block level committees can at best achieve capability building.  This should be pursued as an interim measure.
ü  Moily Commission –Panchayats
Moily Administrative Reforms Commission observes:” Provision of health care facilities through PHCs ,CHCs and hospitals and prevention of diseases through health education are the two major components of the health care system in rural areas”. It recommends that primary health care “ could be entrusted to local governments under the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution in order to give a special thrust to this sector”
The idea of entrusting primary health care to local government i.e. Panchayati raj Institutions(PRI’s), deserves serious consideration. Keeping in view the fact that PRIs in Haryana are not as developed as in some other states and are in a state of evolution, a broad based local committee can be thought of which should comprise some members of the Panchayat, some primary health officials, representatives pf weaker sections, women etc.

ü  Delegation of Powers to CMOs:  This is a desirable goal for increasing the efficiency of the system and for responsiveness to local needs.  We however need to view decentralization in the current context – where there is little innovation, where there are serious mismatches, where officers are officiating and accountability is non enforceable, where management skill are low and where administrative powers and financial resources are limited.


Our recommendation is therefore, to make decentralization:
Ø  The Chief Medical Officer must be a regular appointee, not officiating.
Ø  The Chief Medical Officer must have a minimum tenure of three years.
Ø  The Chief Medical Officer must have served as block medical officer or programme officer
Ø  Be part of the health management cadre if this is created and officer must have had public health management training (for ensuring capability).
Ø  Purchases and infrastructure development must have the state level managerial arrangements as indicated above.
Ø  A state level body on capability building and technical advice on planning must be accessible to him/her.
If all the above conditions are satisfied then the Chief Medical Officers powers must be enhanced to a level where it includes modifying and creating his own health programmes based on the district health plan and seeking budgetary support for it.  The administrative powers of the CMO must be at least tht of the joint director.  All purchases required to reach recommended norms of service delivery, district level recruitment of staff, promotions and training to reach service delivery norms should be incrementally bought under the district powers along with technical support arrangements from the state level.In the absence of the above five criteria being realized the existing powers are perhaps what is optimal, along with rigorous supervision.
  • The Development of a Health Administrative Cadre
ü  Need for Two  Cadre Streams: Some clinicians are not interested in or resent administrative work but can not refuse the offer for it is related to seniority and status.  There are some who would want to undertake administrative work, would prefer this for their career and would be happy to get themselves qualified in this area.  But to give up clinical work especially in the private practice domain is a loss of both professional status and income.  These contradictions need to be resolved pragmatically by charting two career streams – one clinical and one administrative.
ü  The Health Administrative Stream: A health administrative cadre may be created of all the persons working as BMOs, CMOs, District and State Programme Officers, and officers in the training institutions.  All would be class I officers.  These persons are paid 25% or such of salary as non practicing allowance and forbidden from practice.  They are further given a travel allowance for supervision work if not provided with a vehicle.  Their opportunities of promotion are easier and they may even become class I earlier, but they would have more transfers and would have to serve in difficult areas first.  They would get one year training over two or three spells – in management, in public health and epidemiology and health planning.  They could be eligible for a one year sabbatical once in six years.  They would be part of a state cadre.
ü  The Clinical Stream: Those who opt for the clinical stream get no allowance and face less transfers.  They have little promotion avenues though specialized training can enhance their clinical skills.  They can however rise to head district and sub-district  civil hospitals as civil surgeons and with hospital administration training go onto being medical superintendents of tertiary care hospitals.  The civil surgeon would serve under the CHMO so that there is a clear chain of command especially as the specialists posted there are needed for public health functions in other facilities.  However they would have considerable autonomy over hospital management.  Alternatively the post of civil surgeon can be abolished.  Those in the clinical stream can opt to be part of a district cadre.
ü  First Ten Years-Common Cadre:  The details have to be worked out by a committee.  The general principle is that for the first ten years everyone is of a common cadre and then they choose one of two career plans, both with their own attractions.
The Post of the BMO
ü  The BMO should be Made a Designated Post.  It should be the mandatory entrance point into the administrative cadre.  It should require a minimum of 10 years of service to become a BMO.
ü  Since the creation of a medical administrative stream within is a difficult decision to make, a number of immediate steps are also suggested.  These include:
ü  A three-day induction orientation conducted at state level, every quarter, for all BMOs who are appointed in that quarter.  This orientation helps them learn all the basic programmes and the administrative issues that they have to handle.
ü  The development of annual block level plan with guidance where they identify their goals and plan their activities and mark out the constraints in equipment, drugs and infrastructures etc. for action by the district.
ü  A provision of a block medical officer honorarium/allowance if we are able to ensure:
Ø  Tenure of at least three years.
Ø  That this is not seen as an opportunity for generating private earnings – for themselves of for sleaze within the system.
Ø  That the BMO assignment is linked to developing and implementing a measured and monitored block level health plan.
Ø  If tenure is assured to also insist on every BMO completing a three month distance education programme on management aspects arranged by the state government in collaboration with some institution with expertise in health management.
Ø  Empowering BMO with powers and support from the CMO and state office required to affect their block level plans including the provision of an adequate imprest fund and basic modern office support.
District Programme Officers as Deputy CMOs
The post of programme officers should be seen as assistants to the CMO and be part of the administration cadre.  Instead of designating them in an adhoc manner each district may have four officers to assist the CMO who would hold largely administrative “Deputy CMO” function.  These could be a programme officer for RCH programmes including immunization and family welfare, another for all other national programmes, a third for training and IEC functions who is in charge of the district training centre, and a fourth for purchases, distribution, logistics of all supplies and infrastructure.  Along with the CMO and with adequate administrative and office support this would be available district leadership team.  If needs to be emphasized that all the five are trained in public health and ideally form part of an administrative cadre.

District Chief Health and Medical Officer
The Chief Medical Officer should necessarily be a regular appointment on promotion,l with adequate training and experience working as both programme officer and a block medical officer and assured of three-year tenure at least.  In such a context more powers can be delegated to this post.
  • Development of management skills & The development of planning capability
If mandatory training is introduced for all district programme officers and Chief Medical Officers and Deputy Directors we would get eventually get more planning capable staff in the directorate.  A three-month health management course by a national institute done by correspondence would be the basic minimum qualification needed.
It is also important to ensure that all those who become joint directors and directors have served as district Chief Medical Officers and that all deputy directors nd CMOs have worked as BMOs or district programme officers.
Development of planning capability in the directorate also requires further inputs from operational research and from epidemiological work.  Understanding the rigour of this by participating in this or at least using such reports consciously needs to be built in.  Without such experience planning is arbitrary, unscientific and becomes an expression of power relationships with dependence on externally made and poorly adapted programme designs. Further, in the current context, opportunities for interaction with that section of NGOs who are active in health advocacy or community action at both national and state level is essential to develop a critical insight into ones own mindset and to critically evaluate programme designs.