Tuesday, 6 October 2020

AMAR UJALA

 दुनियाभर में कोरोना वायरस का संक्रमण काफी तेजी से फैल रहा है। कई जगहों पर तो संक्रमण के मामले नहीं के बराबर आ रहे थे, लेकिन अब एक बार फिर उन जगहों पर संक्रमण की रफ्तार बढ़ गई है। इस वायरस से दुनियाभर में अब तक तीन करोड़ 57 लाख से भी अधिक लोग संक्रमित हो चुके हैं जबकि 10 लाख 45 हजार से अधिक लोगों की मौत हो चुकी है। इस बीच विश्व स्वास्थ्य संगठन ने कोरोना के संक्रमण को लेकर एक डराने वाला खुलासा किया है। संगठन लीडर्स की एक विशेष बैठक में कहा गया है कि हो सकता है कि दुनिया में हर 10 में से एक व्यक्ति कोरोना वायरस से संक्रमित हुआ हो। मीडिया रिपोर्ट्स के मुताबिक, संगठन के एक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी का कहना है कि इसका मतलब है दुनिया की कुल आबादी का एक हिस्सा खतरे में है। 


स्विट्जरलैंड के जेनेवा स्थित विश्व स्वास्थ्य संगठन के मुख्यालय में हुई बैठक में संगठन ने कहा कि कोरोना संक्रमण का असली आंकड़ा 80 करोड़ के करीब हो सकता है जबकि अभी तक करीब साढ़े तीन करोड़ लोगों के ही संक्रमित होने की पुष्टि हुई है। कई विशेषज्ञ भी पहले से ही ये कह रहे हैं कि संक्रमण के पुष्ट मामलों की अपेक्षा संक्रमण का असली आंकड़ा कहीं अधिक हो सकता है। 

कोरोना वायरस के संक्रमण का पहला मामला पिछले साल चीन के वुहान में दर्ज किया गया था और तब से लेकर अब तक 10 महीने का वक्त बीत चुका है, लेकिन कोरोना का संक्रमण घटने के बजाए बढ़ता ही जा रहा है। कुछ देशों में इसे रोकने के लिए कई तरह के प्रतिबंध लगाए गए थे, लेकिन अब समय के साथ उसमें ढील दी गई है, जिसका नतीजा ये है कि महामारी की दूसरी लहर देखने को मिल रही है और संक्रमण की रफ्तार में काफी तेजी आ गई है।

कोरोना के संक्रमण से सबसे ज्यादा प्रभावित देशों की सूची में अमेरिका शीर्ष पर बना हुआ है। वहां 76 लाख 79 हजार से अधिक लोग कोरोना वायरस से संक्रमित हो चुके हैं जबकि मरने वालों का आंकड़ा दो लाख के पार है। वहीं भारत की अगर बात करें तो यहां भी संक्रमितों की संख्या 66 लाख 85 हजार से अधिक हो गई है जबकि मृतकों की संख्या एक लाख के पार है और यह संख्या दिन-ब-दिन बढ़ती ही जा रही है। हालांकि सुखद बात ये है कि यहां संक्रमण से ठीक होने वालों की संख्या भी तेजी से बढ़ रही है। यहां अब तक 56 लाख से अधिक लोग इस वायरस से ठीक हो चुके हैं। 

कोरोना वायरस से निपटने के लिए वैक्सीन बनाने का काम तेजी से चल रहा है। उम्मीद जताई जा रही है कि अगले साल भारत को वैक्सीन मिल जाएगी। हाल ही में केंद्रीय स्वास्थ्य मंत्री डॉ. हर्षवर्धन ने कहा है कि सरकार का लक्ष्य है कि अगले साल जुलाई तक 20-25 करोड़ नागरिकों को कोरोना का टीका लग जाए और इसके लिए वैक्सीन की 40-50 करोड़ डोज हासिल करने की योजना बनाई जा रही है।  


हालांकि जब तक वैक्सीन नहीं आ जाती है, तब तक लोगों को बेहद ही संभल कर रहने की जरूरत है। वैज्ञानिकों और विशेषज्ञों द्वारा कोरोना से बचने के लिए बताए गए नियमों का पालन करें, जिसमें समय-समय पर हाथों को साबुन-पानी से धोना, मास्क पहनना और सामाजिक दूरी आदि शामिल हैं

Wednesday, 12 August 2020

The Myth of Immune-Boosters

 The Myth of Immune-Boosters

 Artificial immune boosting may not be the right strategy to fight against COVID-19. Staying calm, maintaining social distancing and hygiene and using protective gear will help us in the long run.


The human immune system (inherited from gazillions of its preceding species in evolution) consists of a rather well-endowed immune response network. A network composed of cells (neutrophils, eosinophils, T cells, B cells, macrophages, and other cells) and non-cellular molecules (cytokines, leukotrienes, enzymes, etc.) form a formidable resistance, which intensely and strategically defend the wonderful bulwark that the human body is. This network however is useful and wonderful so long as it starts and ends on cue and does not overstay its welcome or overdo what is expected of it. In other words, balance is the key. “Immune boosting” would therefore mean artificially getting it all excited and ready to fight. Fight it must but only when it is necessary against a defined adversary, as much and as long as it requires to reinstate a desired state of health. 

        Not The Myth of Immune-Boosters Artificial immune boosting may not be the right strategy to fight against COVID-19. Staying calm, maintaining social distancing and hygiene and using protective gear will help us in the long run. more. Not less. This well-orchestrated response by a disciplined battalion of the immune army requires a band of welltrained scouts, elite strategists, and some seriously effective mobilisation of foot soldiers (granulocytes), mounted soldiers (antibody-dependant cell cytotoxicity), archers (inflammatory mediators and their receptors), powerful cannons (histamine, bradykinin), missiles (IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α, IFN-γ, chemokines), and target-locked nukes (antibodies). This arsenal in the immune repertoire (as is apparent from the analogies) must be kept under check. If not, tremendous and uncontrolled bombardment by its own defence system shall devastate the body’s ramparts (auto-immune response). We do not want that to happen under any circumstances because that will be disastrous! Now, to define "boosting" we revisit the original task, that of keeping the body in a state of preparedness but not draw first blood. Thus, (i) a "well-oiled" group of scouts (cells that are part of the first line of defence in our innate immune network and generally shoot from the hips but do manage to come back with useful information about a novel enemy) must be maintained such that even if an insidious attack is able to breach the body’s security system, it will not be allowed to penetrate too deep; (ii) the level of co-ordination among this network of immune players (innate and acquired immunity, long-term and short-term immunity, memory-directed immune stratification and new game plan against an unforeseen intruder) must be clear and specific such that no confusion (usually created by an intruder to set off false alarms) maybe unduly provoked. Thus, no immunosuppressant, no immunedepletion to red herring signals staged by sneaky pathogenic microbes maybe unduly evoked; and (iii) when the time comes, action is swift and lethal and cleanly eliminates the intruder. At last we come to the main point of this long prologue—SARS-CoV-2 and its pet scourge COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 enters the human cell via a membranebound enzyme angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) and a transmembrane serene protease 2 that its spike protein combines efficiently with to initiate a smooth endocytosis reaction and the viral payload gains unobstructed entry into the cell. The receptor-binding spike making up its corona is the key to the host cell’s aforementioned lock. The dropletborne virus enters through the lung and quickly infiltrates circulation via its chosen portal and spreads systemically. ACE-2 being a blood pressure regulator, for the host humans, COVID-19 that may start with all the hallmarks of pneumonia, quickly and silently takes over multiple organs entering their cells via the endothelial lining of blood vessels, all of which express its chosen receptor protein. And all hell breaks loose! A severe “cytokine storm” starting with low levels of IFN-γand high levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, CCL2, CCL3, CCL5 in huge amounts like a tsunami of powerful missiles by the body’s own defence


system completely overwhelms the immune system. This is what kills us—a total failure of our espionage system (scout cells), all the trained commandos, the diplomats, the strategists, and the entire security is breached and arson of the main weapon’s manufacturing units of the body leads to mayhem. Complete immune depletion due to foolish and explosive squandering of precious defensive resources turns into our own nemesis. And a final fatal blow jeopardises the thing called life from the poor human host. Thus, immune boosting, I feel, maybe accomplished simply by leading a balanced life—good nutrition (building, repairing and maintaining all the important faculties of the body and not just the immune system since it is not an isolated one), optimum and enjoyable activities (moderate exercise such as walking, swimming, yoga, pranayam and intellectually or creatively stimulating tasks that generate the happy 'hormones') and sufficient and quality sleep (that recharges, replenishes and regenerates the expenditure in the aforementioned enterprises). Ayurvedic knowledge (curcumin in turmeric, fisetin in apple and strawberry, piperine in black pepper, etc.), local and seasonal food (raw fruits and coloured vegetables high in flavonoids, phenolic compounds rich in anti-oxidants), clean lifestyle sans the redundant practices (avoiding nothing but excess), and effective armament (of offensive attack against the infectious agents) supplemented by western medicine (antiviral drugs such as avifavir, ritonavir, remdesivir, and others like hydroxychloroquine and azithromycine combination therapy, convalescent plasma therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) by recombinant DNA technology and support from ventilator, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and excellent supportive care) may yet save us even if that wicked and troublesome rogue virus the SARS-CoV-2 manages to gain entry. A vaccine (such as Moderna’s mRNA1273 or Oxford University’s ChAdOx1, which are in various stages of clinical trial) may take long to come and offer a shield against COVID-19. And while we are at it, may I warn against frivolous advertisements claiming immune boosting because there is nothing to gain from a “boosted” immunity other than expediting and intensifying a pro-inflammatory disease like COVID-19. We do not want our immunity to be unnecessarily boosted. We want it to stay calm and in a state of preparedness so that it will not be fooled and respond to provocation and spend itself unnecessarily. We want the casualties of war (immune maintenance and immune surveillance circuits) to be efficiently replenished, replaced and regenerated and rejuvenated to remain healthy and balanced. We want capacity to generate and maintain a diverse immune weaponry, not necessarily in a state of preparedness but skilled and fit and there in case they are called into action. And most importantly, we want the regulatory mechanisms to remain alert and effective such that even if we need to go into a well-thought-out war (innate and acquired immunity including but not limited to inflammation and T and B cell-mediated cytotoxicity or humoral response, the designated cells with very specific and specialised immune functions, signalling peptides, receptors that regulate intercellular cross-talk, etc.) they are efficiently regulated and brought down to normal levels when it is over. Thus, balance is the key to a healthy ability to mount anti-viral immunity, rather than “boosting” it. I’d say, stay calm, stay safe, and stay alert, but most importantly, stay clean (social distancing, protective gear, hygiene) and “immune boosting” or not, we shall be able to keep the COVID-19 at bay. Dr Ena Ray Banerjee is Professor, Dept of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Immunology and Regenerative Medicine Research Unit, Translational Outcomes Research. Email: erb@caluniv.ac.in

COVAXIN

 With the announcement of COVAXIN by Bharat Biotech and ZyCov-D Vaccine by Zydus Cadila the proverbial silver line in the dark clouds of COVID-19 appears at the horizon. The nod given by the Drug Controller General of India CDSCO (The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation) for the conduct of the human trial for the vaccines marks the beginning of the end. More than 140 candidate vaccines are under various stages of development. One of the leading candidates is AZD1222 developed by Jenner Institute of University of Oxford and licensed to AstraZeneca BritishSwedish multinational pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Cambridge, England. Parallelly, Indian institutions have also engaged in R&D for the development of vaccines in India. With the primary scientific inputs coming from ICMR’s Pune-based institution National Institute of Virology and Hyderabadbased CSIR institution Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, six Indian companies are working on a vaccine for COVID-19. IIT Mandi develops 98% efficient face masks from waste plastic bottles at nearly one tenth the cost . Researchers at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi developed high-efficiency face masks out of waste plastic bottles. The PET bottles were successfully converted into a nanofibre membrane. This membrane can be layered with nylon on both sides to create the mask. Research scholars Ashish Kakoria and Sheshang Singh Chandel produced the mask under the guidance of Prof Sumit Sinha Ray. The nanofibre membrane is 250 times thinner than a human hair and can remove minute particles with 98% efficiency. 

SUB HEALTH CENTRES

INFRASTRUCTURE OF A HEALTH SUB CENTRE
1. Waiting room 
2, Labour room with one labour table and NBC , 
3.1 room with 2-4 beds ,
 4.room for store 
 5 1 room for clinic/office 
 6 Toilet facility in labour room, ward room 
7 Residential facility for one ANM  
8 Residential facility {2 staff (E) and 3 staff (D)}
EQUIPMENT IN SUB HEALTH CENTRE
1. Basin 825 ml.: 1 + 1 (D)  
2 Basin deep (capacity 6 litre):  
3 Tray instrument/Dressing with cover  
4 Flashlight/Torch Box-type pre-focused 
5 Torch (ordinary)2  
6 Dressing Drum with cover 0.945 liters ss: 1  
7 Hemoglobin meter – set Sahli type complete1  
8 Weighing Scale, Adult 125 kg/280  
9 Weighing Scale, Infant (10 Kg) 1  
10 Weighing Scale, (baby) hanging type, 5 kg:1  
11 Sterilizer 1  
12 Surgical Scissors straight: 1  
13 Sphygmomanometer Aneroid 300 mm with cuff: 1+ 2(D)  
14 Kelly’s hemostat Forceps straight : 1  
15 Vulsellum Uterine Forceps curved: 1  
16 Cusco’s/Graves Speculum vaginal bi-valve medium: 1  
17 Sims retractor/depressor: 1  
18 Sims speculum vaginal double ended ISS Medium: 1
19 Uterine sound graduated: 1  
20 Cheatle’s forcep: 1  
21 Vaccine carrier: 2 
22 Ice pack box: 8 
23 Sponge holder: 2 + 2 (D) 
24 Plain Forceps: 5 
25 Tooth Forceps: 2  
26 Needle Holder: 2  
27 Suture needle straight: 10  
28 Suture needle curved: 10 
29 Kidney tray: 4 
30 Artery Forceps, straight: 5 + 5 (D) 
31 Dressing Forceps (spring type): 1  
32 Cord cutting Scissors, Blunt, curved on flat: 1  
33 Clinical Thermometer oral and rectal: 1 
34 Talquist Hb scale 1 
35 Stethoscope: 1  
36 Foetoscope: 1  
37 Hub cutter and Needle destroyer: 1  
38 Ambu Bag (Pediatric size) with Baby mask: 1  
39 Suction Machine: 1D  
40 Oxygen Administration Equipment:1 
41 Tracking bag and tickler box (Immunization): 1D 
42 Measuring tape: 1  
43 I/V Stand:1 
Source: Field survey

C. Physical Performance vis-à-vis Equipments
The data on physical performance of Sub Centres in Mahendergarh with respect to equipments have been presented in table-3. A glance at the table shows that none of the Sub Centres in district Mahendergarh had a 6 litre capacity deep Basin, Kelly’s hemostat, straight Forceps, Suture straight needles, Suture curved needles, Oxygen Administration Equipment and a I/V Stand. The sub centres at Deroli Ahir, Majra Kalan, Jatwas, Duloth Ahir, Atali and Beri did not have equipments mentioned at sr. no. 16, 19, 11, 11, 18 and 21 respectively out of a total of 43 equipments required in a Sub Centre as per IPHS guidelines.
             The data on physical performance of Sub Centres in Sirsa with respect to equipments have been presented in table 4. A glance at the table shows that availability / non availability of equipments shows almost a uniform pattern across various Sub Centres. None of the SCs in district Sirsa had a 6 litre capacity deep Basin, Kelly’s hemostat straight Forceps, a Sterilizer, Surgical Scissors straight, Sims speculum vaginal double ended ISS Medium, Suture straight needles, Suture curved needles, Oxygen Administration Equipment, Talquist Hb scale, Foetoscope and a Suction Machine. The sub centres at Pohrka, Khari Surera, Jivan Nagar, Nuhian wali, Chormar and Kalanwali Village did not have 12 equipments each out of a total of 43 equipments required in a Sub Centre as per IPHS guidelines.




Conclusion
The findings of the paper shows that the sub-centres of district Mahendergarh are good in term of human resources but they are in poor condition in the terms of building and equipments as per the IPHS. The sub-centres of District Sirsa are in poor condition in all terms i.e. human resources, building infrastructure and equipments. Sub-Health Centre (Sub-centre) is the most peripheral and first point of contact between the primary health care system and the community providing all the primary health care services. The success of NHM would depend largely on the proper functioning of Sub-centres providing services of acceptable standard to the people. So, the government should ensure the human resources, building infrastructure and equipment facilities at the grass root level for the better implementation of health policies.

Cuba offers UK salutary lesson in ‘shoe-leather’ epidemiology:

 COVID-19: Cuba offers UK salutary lesson in ‘shoe-leather’ epidemiology:

Cuba’s successful containment of COVID-19 through door-to-door screening of every home in the country, shows how ‘shoe-leather’ epidemiology could have averted the dramatic failure of the UK’s response to the pandemic. In Cuba there have been 2,173 confirmed cases and 83 deaths, with no reported deaths throughout the first week in June.

The term ‘shoe leather’ epidemiology, where much of the work is carried out on foot in the community, was first demonstrated during the Soho cholera epidemic in 1854.

Writing in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Professor John Ashton describes how, when China first reported the emerging epidemic in Wuhan in January 2020, Cuba promptly drew up a cross-government contingency plan. When the first cases of the virus were confirmed in the country among three tourists from Italy on 11 March, the plan was immediately put into action.

Screening was carried out in Cuba by tens of thousands of family doctors, nurses and medical students on foot, with testing, tracing and quarantining of suspected cases in state-run isolation centres for 14 days.

Prof Ashton said: “Cuba has long been renowned for its ability to turn in world beating health statistics while continuing to struggle economically. With a health system grounded in public health and primary care, the country invests heavily in producing health workers who are primarily trained to work in the community. Their efforts with COVID-19 have been outstanding.”

He added: “Cuba was one of the first countries to send health workers to support the control of the epidemic in Wuhan, back in January, just one example of its unrivalled commitment to international solidarity in humanitarian disasters.”

Shoe leather epidemiology in the age of COVID: lessons from Cuba (DOI: 10.1177/0141076820938582) by John Ashton is published the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine


The failure of the UK government to follow the advice of the World Health Organization to ‘Test, Test, Test’ for COVID-19 has cost the country dear. Having been slow to treat the pandemic with due urgency once the initial Public Health Emergency of International Concern had been called at the end of January, the country of John Snow and the Broad Street pump was left playing an embarrassing and fatal game of catch-up as the disease spread.

For those trained in the proud tradition of UK public health, this disaster has proved all the more galling in its neglect of the basic lessons of 1854 and the Soho cholera epidemic, when shoe leather epidemiology first demonstrated its worth. It was from walking the streets from house to house and business to business that Snow was able to demonstrate the concentration of cases among those drinking water from the street pump and persuaded the select vestry to remove the pump handle.

This very practical and local approach to public health provided the leit motif for its effective practice for generations until the disastrous reorganisation of the National Health Service, and with it public health, in England in 2013. The creation of a flawed agency, Public Health England, with its unremitting centralisation and undermining of local and regional public health, paved the way for the dramatic failure of response to COVID-19 in 2020. The inability to undertake large-scale testing for the coronavirus and to follow through with contact tracing, triaging, isolation and treatment followed as light follows day. Local capacity of the skilled workforce and local knowledge was run down and along with it the ability to mobilise the rich network of laboratory assets. Over-dependence on prominent London figures, institutions and laboratories, together with fly-by-night private sector contractors operating from anonymous call centres, were no substitute for hands-on experience with local knowledge and established networks of collaboration. The result was chaos and incompetence.

Comparison with one country that has performed exceptionally in response to the emergency illustrates what might have been possible had we not seemed hellbent on destroying a functioning public health system and had instead played to national strengths in primary care. Cuba has long been renowned for its ability to turn in world beating health statistics while continuing to struggle economically. With a health system grounded in public health and primary care, the country invests heavily in producing health workers who are primarily trained to work in the community, with only a small proportion going on to specialise in hospital medicine. Their efforts with COVID-19 have been outstanding.

When China first reported that a new coronavirus had been identified as the cause of the emerging epidemic in Wuhan in January 2020, Cuba promptly drew up a cross-government contingency plan and was ready to act. The first cases were confirmed among three tourists from the high disease incidence area of Lombardy in Italy on 11 March, the same day that World Health Organization declared that COVID-19 qualified as a pandemic, the patients were immediately hospitalised and the plan put into action. Tens of thousands of family doctors, nurses and medical students screened all homes in the country for cases on foot, with testing, tracing and quarantining suspected cases in state-run isolation centres for 14 days. The epidemic was soon contained after a total of 2173 confirmed cases and 83 deaths with no reported deaths throughout the first week in June. In addition, Cuba had been one of the first countries to send health workers to support the control of the epidemic in Wuhan, back in January, just one example of its unrivalled commitment to international solidarity in humanitarian disasters.

As the pandemic in the UK enters a new phase and we wait to see whether there will be a second and third wave, as happened in the Spanish flu of 1918–1920, or whether it just disappears as happened with its close relative SARS in 2003, the time for reflection has already begun. Let us hope that we can put to one side the Little England mentality that has been so much in evidence in the handling of COVID-19 and be willing to learn from others who still understand and value the ‘shoe leather epidemiology’ that was invented in Broad Street 170 years ago!

Friday, 7 August 2020

NEWS CLICK

 

The Khattar government’s spending on healthcare stands at around 4% of the total state budget.
 

Sunday, 19 July 2020

गाँव के स्तर पर की जाने वाली गतिविधियाँ

गाँव के स्तर पर की जाने वाली गतिविधियाँ
1 . खेल कूद प्रतियोगिताओं का आयोजन ---- हरियाणा में खेल कूद प्रतियोगिताओं की अपनी एक परम्परा रही है । इस पर गाँव के युवक व युवतियों को खास ध्यान देना चाहिए । इसके लिए लोगों से चन्द इकठा किया जा सकता है ।
1 कुश्ती प्रतियोगिता 2  कब्बडी प्रतियोगिता 3 वालीबाल प्रतियोगिता 4 दौड़ प्रतियोगिता 5 कुरसी  दौड़ 6 ट्रैक्टर से खेत बाहने की प्रतियोगिता 7 साफ़ सुथरे घर की प्रतियोगिता 8 साफ़ गलियों की प्रतियोगिता  9 चाट्टी दौड़ प्रतियोगिता ।
2  हाथ से बनाई गयी चीजों की प्रतियोगिता : बुनाई / कढ़ाई / सिलाई / रंगाई / छपाई / की प्रतियोगिता कपड़ों पर / लकड़ी पर/ फ़ैवीकोल पर / शीशे पर / ओढ़नी कढ़ाई प्रतियोगिताया किसी और चीज पर
साक्षरता का अनुभव बताता है कि इस प्रतियोगिता के माध्यम से जन चेतना केंद्र को आत्म निर्भर बनाने की तरफ ले जाया जा सकता है ।
3  कर सेवा : नाली साफ़ करना/ स्कूल में सफेदी करना/ स्कूल में शौचालय बनाना / गली की सफाई /चौपाल का रख रखाव व उसकी मरम्मत करवाना / कुँए की देखभाल /मीठे पानी के नलकों की देखभाल /लाइब्रेरी के लिए कमरा बनाना / खड़े पानी में मछरों को मारने के उपाय करना / स्वास्थ्य कैंपों का आयोजन करना ।
4  सांस्कृतिक  कार्यक्रमों का आयोजन : चन्द्र शेखर आजाद/ भगत सिंह / नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस / मुंशी प्रेम चंद के जन्म दिन / छब्बीस जनवरी / पंद्रह अगस्त / पर सांस्कृतिक कार्यक्रमों का आयोजन अवश्य किया जाना चाहिए / साक्षरता सांग / लाड़ली सांग / नाटकों का आयोजन किया जाये / महिलाओं का साक्षरता सतसंग किया जा सकता है जिसमें वे गीत गायें । स्थानीय त्योहारों / स्वतंत्रता सेनानियों या गाँव की जानी मानी हस्तियों की याद में सांस्कृतिक कार्यक्रम किये जाने चाहिए ।
5  गाँव में जन चेतना केंद्र की देख रख में महिलाओं का स्वयं सहायता समूह चलाया जा सकता है । पानीपत का अनुभव हमारे पास है
6  वाशिंग पाउडर  बनाने की ट्रेनिंग लेकर गाँव के लिए वाशिंग पाउडर / साबुन बनाने का काम शुरू किया जा सकता है ।
7  अचार तथा चटनी बनाने की ट्रेनिंग जन चेतना केंद्र के कार्यकर्ताओं और नव साक्षरों को दी जा सकती है ।
8  साक्षरता कक्षाएं : जन चेतना केंद्र की देख रख में निरक्षरों की कक्षा लगाई जा सकती है । जो लोग स्कूल जाना छोड़ गए उनकी कक्षाओं के बारे में भी सोचा जा सकता है या उन्हें फिर से स्कूल भेज जा सकता है । दो साक्षरता की कक्षाएं हरेक जन चेतना केंद्र की देख रख में चलायी जाएँ ।
9 पुस्तकालय : जरूरत के हिसाब से , रूचिकर , सूचना देने वाली तथा साहित्यिक किताबें जुटाई जाएँ तथा जन चेतना केंद्र का एक पुस्तकालय अवश्य होना चाहिए । पुस्तकालय में अख़बारों की व्यवस्था भी की जाये ।  गाँव में बड़ा पुस्तकालय हो सकता है जहाँ से छोटे गाँव के छोटे पुस्तकालयों को किताबों का आदान प्रदान किया जा सके । प्रत्येक गाँव में एक चलती फिरती लाइब्रेरी भी होनी चाहिए । शरुआत के तौर पर कुछ गाँव में महिलाओं के पुस्तकालय का गठन किया जा सकता है । पुस्तकालयों का काम संभालने के लिए एक कमेटी का गठन किया जाना बहुत जरूरी है । कमेटी लोगों में पुस्तकें पढ़ने की आदत को बढ़ावा देने के लिए रचनात्मक कदम उठाएगी । इस कमेटी में 50 % महिलाएं हों ।
दीवारी अखबार का विकास भी यह कमेटी कर सकती है
स्थानीय पत्रिका की योजना भी बनायी जा सकती है ।  
स्कूल की लाइब्रेरी से तालमेल किया जा सकता है
कम कीमत की अच्छी/ जनतांत्रिकता व धर्म निरपेक्षता व राष्ट्रीय एकता की भावनाओं को बढ़ावा देने वाली पुस्तकें भी जरूर होनी चाहिए ।  
मुंशी प्रेम चाँद / शरतचन्द्र जैसे पर्शिद्ध लेखकों का साहित्य भी हो ।
10  पठन पाठन संस्कृति का विकास करना :
जन वाचन आंदोलन के माध्यम से यह बखूबी किया जा सकता है
लोगों को पढ़कर किताबें सुनायी जाएँ और पढ़ने को   प्रेरित किया जाये
किताबों के मेले लगाए जाएँ
प्रत्येक गाँव में किताब उत्सवों का आयोजन किया जाये
भेंट में किताबें देने का प्रचलन बढ़ाया जाये
लोगों को किताबें खरीदने के लिए प्रेरित किया जाये
इस सारे काम में लोगों की सक्रिय हिस्सेदारी होना बहुत जरूरी है ।
11  चर्चा मंडल / चर्चा समूह / विचार गोष्ठी
चर्चा समूहों का गठन किया जाये
महिला चर्चा मंडल अलग से गठित किये जा सकते हैं ।  अच्छा हो यदि महिला और पुरुषों के इक्ठ्ठे   ग्रुपों का भी विकास किया जाये
चर्चा का विषय एवं वक्त ये समूह खुद तय करेंगे
विषय विशेषज्ञों को बुला कर चर्चा की शरुआत उनसे करवाई जा सकती है
कुछ लोगों को चर्चा समूहों के संचालन में प्रशिक्षित किया जाना चाहिए ।  उनके पास चर्चा को संचालित करने व दिशा देने के लिए पर्याप्त सामग्री होनी चाहिए
बहस बढ़ने के लिए अनौपचारिक तौर तरीकों का भी इस्तेमाल किया जाना चाहिए
12  प्रशिक्षण कार्यक्रम :
साधारण तथा कम समय के ओरिएंटेशन कार्यक्रमों का , भिन्न विषयों पर मसलन स्वास्थ्य , कृषि , पशु पालन , भोजन पकाना , अचार बनाना , आदि का आयोजन किया जाना चाहिए
विकास से जुड़े मुद्दों के साथ मिलकर वोकेशनल ट्रेनिंग का कर्यक्रम किया जा सकता है
ट्रेनिंग लेने के लिए लोगों को प्रोत्साहित करने के लिए स्वस्थ बेबी कार्यक्रम , अच्छी गृहणी , या अच्छा किसान कार्यक्रमों का आयोजन किया जा सकता है ।
13  सूचना व ज्ञान की खिड़की :
आम जन को  विभिन्न  विभागों  की गतिविधियों से परिचित करवाना ।
जन चेतना केंद्र गाइड को इस प्रकार की किताबें या पैम्फलेट मुहैया करवाना ताकि सूचना आगे जा सके ।
सूचना सामग्री को सरल भाषा में विकशित करना तथा सम्प्रेषण के अलग तरीको - भाषण,चर्चा,स्लाइड शो ,नाटक, गीत,स्वांग,आल्हा,वाल राइटिंग, आदि से लोगों के बीच लेकर जाना ।
अलग अलग विभागों के  विशेषज्ञों ,वैज्ञानिकों और आम जन का विचार विमर्श
14. वैज्ञानिक रुझान उभारना और विकशित करना :
विज्ञान का लोकप्रियकरण करना ।
चमत्कारों का पर्दाफाश करना
अंधविश्वास को दूर करना
तर्क और विश्लेषण की क्षमता पैदा करना
महिलाओं के घर के काम को उचित टेक्नॉलॉजी का ज्ञान देकर कम करना ताकि उनकी हिस्सेदारी सामाजिक विषयों पर बढ़ सके।उदाहरण के लिए बिना धुंए वाला चूल्हा , सोलर कूकर, साईकिल आदि ।
15. महिला सशक्तिकरण पर विशेष ध्यान देना :
चेतना के स्तर पर
आंगनबाड़ी
पंचायत स्तर पर
जन चेतना केंद्र में
महिला स्वास्थ्य संघ में
महिला मण्डल में
बचत समूह- बचत की भावना
महिला और शिक्षा
महिला और कानून
महिला और घरेलू हिंसा
महिला और समता
महिलाओं के प्रशिक्षण की योजना
महिलाओं में सामूहिकता के कार्यक्रम
महिलाओं में वोकेशनल एजुकेशन के कार्यक्रम
16. स्कूल जाने वाले बच्चों को स्कूल पहुँचाना:
गाँव के स्कूल की उम्र के सभी बच्चों को स्कूल में भर्ती करवाना ।
भर्ती हुए बच्चों को स्कूल न छोड़ने के लिए प्रेरित करना ।
जो स्कूल नहीं जा सके या जा सकते उनको अनोपचारिक शिक्षा के माध्यम से औपचारिक शिक्षा तक पहुँचाने में मदद करना ।
ग्राम शिक्षा कमेटी महीने में एक बार मिलकर इस समस्या पर अवश्य बातचीत करे ।
खेल खेल में शिक्षा आदि कार्यक्रमों का फॉलोअप करना ।
17. कानूनी साक्षरता तथा सामजिक मुद्दे :
इस सन्दर्भ में आम जन को सूचना तो दी ही जानी  चाहिए ताकि वे अपने हकों ,कर्तव्यों तथा सामजिक मुद्दों पर अपनी राय कायम कर सकें तथा अपनी भूमिका तय कर सकें ।
18. पानी एवम् भूमि प्रबन्धन योजना :
इसमें हिस्सेदारी करने के लिए गाँव के लोगों को प्रेरित करना । विकास कार्यों में लगे विभागों के साथ तारतम्य स्थापित करना ।
19. गाँव में 40 साल से कम उम्र की बाँझ महिलाओं को चिन्हित करना तथा उनका इलाज कराना।
20. गाँव में स्वास्थ्य रजिस्टर का रख रखाव पूरी जानकारी के साथ रखना ।
21. क्षेत्र गरीबी उन्मूलन /स्वास्थ्य/महिला एवं बालक विकास कार्यक्रमों में सहायता करना मसलन
डी आर डी ए, कृषि,वन,,खान,उद्योग,मछली पालन,डेयरी,रेवेन्यू, वित्तीय संस्थान-इनसे वास्ता कायम करना होगा ।
जन स्वास्थ्य तथा परिवार कल्याण
महिला एवम् बाल विकास विभाग , सामाजिक उत्थान एवम् पंचायत विभाग
किनके माध्यम से :
1 सरपंच, पञ्च, ग्राम सेवक, ग्राम सहायक , वनगार्ड ,स्टॉक मैन, पटवारी,पीडी एस दूकानदार, अध्यापक, बैंक फील्ड ऑफीसर, दुग्धकेंद्र का इंचार्ज, एल आयी सी एजेंट,
2. ए एन एम, एम् एच डब्ल्यू , हैण्डपम्प मैकेनिक , जन स्वास्थ्य रक्षक, नेहरू युवा केंद्र , दाई।
3. आंगनबाड़ी कार्यकर्ता , सहायिका,साथिन , ग्राम सेविका ।
इन सबका केंद्र बिंदु या मिलान बिंदु जन चेतना केंद्र को बनना है ।
जिला स्तर से इस नाभिक बिंदु की भूमिका मोनिटर की जाय।
22. उस गाँव के कुल कितने लोग हैं जो कर्मचारी ,अफसर हैं? वे कहाँ कहाँ काम करते हैं ? तथा जन चेतना केंद्र की गतिविधियों में क्या योगदान दे सकते हैं ?  
23. सामूहिक स्तर पर सब्जियों की बीजाई जैसे घीया , तोरी आदि को गितवाडों में बिजवाना ।
24. पौधारौपन खासकर फलदार वृक्षों का करना ।
25. गाँव की विधवा महिलाओं की सूची तैयार करना तथा उन्हें आर्थिक व् सामजिक सुरक्षा प्रदान करने का जतन करना ।
26. गाँव में  विकलांग लोगों की सूची तैयार करना तथा रेडक्रास से उनकी मदद करवाना।
27. गाँव के चौकीदारों को खासकर जन चेतना केंद्र में शामिल करना । यदि निरक्षर हैं तो उन्हें साक्षर बनाना।
28 . कार्यकर्ताओं की समझ बढ़ाने के लिए वर्कशॉप आदि का आयोजन करना ।
29. अक्षर सैनिकों की पढ़ाई व्यवस्था में मदद करना ।उनकी अक्षर सैनिक मण्डलियों का गठन करना ।
30. जिला कार्यालय से जन चेतना केंद्र का जिन्दा सम्पर्क स्थापित करना :
गाँव से दुकानदार शहर आते हैं उनके माध्यम से
कई गाँव में शहर से अध्यापक पढ़ाने गाँव जाते हैं
कई लोग दिल्ली के डेली पैसेंजर हैं
कई लोग गाँव से शहर नौकरी के लिए रोजाना आते जाते हैं
तीन पहिया/ बस या जीप के चालक
ट्रेक्टर ड्राइवर
31. साक्षरता का हरकारा, आदि पत्र पत्रिकाओं का जन चेतना केंद्र में नियमित रूप से मंगवाना ।
32. महिलाओं की हिस्सेदारी सुनिश्चित की जाये -आशा वर्कर ,मिड डे मील वर्कर आँगन वाड़ी वर्कर आदि।
हर स्तर पर महिलाएं हों
उनके  लिये कार्यशालाओं का आयोजन हो।
मीटिंगें उनके वक्त के हिसाब से तय की जाएँ
मीटिंगों में और कार्यक्रमों में बच्चों की देख रेख की सुविधाओं के बारे  में सोचा जाये ।
आने जाने की समस्याओं पर चर्चा हो।
प्रेस नोट तैयार करने को प्रेरित करें। दरखास्त लिखना सिखाएं ।हिसाब किताब रखना सीखें ।
महिलाओं के प्रति मानवीय समतावादी रूख अपनाएं ।
33. अपनी अपनी डायरी लिखने का काम अपने हाथ में लें
34. गाँव की रिसोर्स मैपिंग का काम करना। भूमि व पानी साक्षरता का काम हाथ में लेना ।
35. दहेज़ समस्या, घूंघट की समस्या, नशाखोरी, बेरोजगारी, आदि सामाजिक मुद्दों पर सेमिनारों का आयोजन करना ।
36. सूचना का अधिकार मौलिक अधिकार हो इसके लिए दबाव बनाना।
37. देश की एकता ,आत्म निर्भरता, राष्ट्र विकास, आदि मुद्दों को समझना तथा लोगों तक इनका अलग अलग ढंग से सम्प्रेषण करना।
38. जातिवाद , धार्मिक कट्टरता , सांस्कृतिक पिछड़ापन , जैसी समस्याओं पर समूहों में चर्चा करना।
39. हरियाणा के विकास की - कृषि क्षेत्र, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मानव संसाधन की समस्याओं पर समूहों में चर्चा करना।
40. हरियाणा को जानो हरियाणा को बदलो - नारे के तहत सर्वेक्षण व स्टेट्स पेपर तैयार करवाने में मदद करना
रणबीर
9812139001
dahiyars@rediffmail.com

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

1. INCOME
2. EDUCATION.
3. RACEAND ETHINICITY
4. TRANSPORTATION
5. HOUSING
6. FOOD ACCESS
7. COMPLEX Health NEEDS
8. INSURANCE
THE CONDITIONSIN WHICH PEOPLE BORN,GROW,WORK, AGE
STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS ---
--GOVERNANCE
--ECONOMICS
--SOCIAL AND PUBLIC POLICIES
--CULTURE ANDSOCIETAL VALUES
--SOCIAL CLASS
--GENDER ETHINICITY
--EDUCATION
--OCCUPATION
--INCOME AND PLACEOF LIVING
INTERMEDIATARY DETERMINANTSOF HEALTH
--MATERIAL CIRCUMSTANCES--Like Living and working conditions,food availabilityetc, exposure to risks, risk behaviours,bilogical and psychological factors .

हरियाणा में स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं का ढांचा

हरियाणा में स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं का ढांचा
1.सिविल अस्पताल --68
2.सामुदायिक स्वास्थ्य केंद्र--128 होने चाहिए-143
3.प्राथमिक स्वास्थ्य केंद्र-531 होने चाहिए-573
4. उप स्वास्थ्य केंद्र--- 2650 होने चाहिए--3440
5. पोलीक्लीनिक्स--11
6. अर्बन हेल्थ सेन्टर--11
7. डिस्पेंसरी--4

सन्दर्भ-(haryanahealth.nic.in)---INFRASTRUCTURE

1. महिलाओं और बच्चों में कुपोषण अभी भी ज्यादा है हरियाणा में 
2.71.1%(6--59) महीनों के बीच के बच्चे खून की कमी का शिकार हैं।
3.62.7% (15--49)महिला और किशोरी खून की कमी की शिकार हैं।
4.6.5% बच्चे (6--23 महीने ) ही ठीक खुराक पा रहे हैं।
5.34% बच्चों (5 साल से कम उम्र के ) में विकास अवरुद्ध stunted है(उम्र के हिसाब से कद कम होना)
6.21.2% बच्चों (5 साल से कम उम्र ) में वेस्टिड ग्रोथ (कद के हिसाब से वजन कम होना) है। और 9 % बच्चे severly wasted हैं।
7.कम वजन के बच्चे(5 साल से कम उम्र के)29.4% हैं।
(The pioneer 15 Dec.2017) Chief Minister brief
1.55% गर्भवती महिलाएं (15--49) खून की कमी का शिकार ज्यादा कुपोषण के कारण
2.63.1% आम महिला (15-49) में भी खून की कमी मिली।
3.62.7% किशोरियां (15-19) खून की कमी का शिकार।
4.29.7% किशोर (15-19) खून की कमी का शिकार
5. 36.6% किशोरियां(15-19) कुपोषित हैं ।
6.30.6% किशोर (15-19) कुपोषित 
7.Severe  Acute Malnutrition (2015-16)--1050 बच्चे दाखिल हुए जिले के nutrition rehabilitation centre में और 1029 बच्चे (2016-17) में दाखिल हुए ।
(NFHS-4 (2015--16)और District Helath Information Software-2)

Friday, 17 July 2020

कुछ बिंदु

कुछ बिंदु
दुनिया के स्तर पर
1 . संसार की कम से कम आधी आबादी जरूरी स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं से वंचित है।
2 . करीब १० करोड़ लोग 100 मिलियन प्रतिदिन 1 . 90 पोंड पर गुजारा  करते हैं।
3 .  80 करोड़ लोग (दुनिया की जनसंख्या का लगभग 12 %)  का 10 % परिवार के स्वास्थ्य पर खर्च करते हैं। 
भारत  के स्तर पर
1 . प्राइवेट सेक्टर 80 % opd सेवाएं और 60 % दाखिल मरीजों की सेवाएं प्रदान  है।
2 . 77 % ग्रामीण और 70 % अर्बन में  आउट ऑफ़ पॉकेट स्वास्थ्य खर्च का सिर्फ दवाओं पर  होता है।
3 .  इस आउट ऑफ़ पॉकेट स्वास्थ्य खर्च के कारण पिछले साल 5 . 5   करोड़ लोग गरीबी रेखा से नीचे चले गए
लोक सभा में प्रस्तुत --अगस्त 28 , 2019 
 . जन स्वास्थय सेवाएं और स्वास्थ्य के सामाजिक निर्णायक  
1 .   जन स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं पर बहुत कम खर्च 
2 .  जरूरत से कम  स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं का ढांचा --उप स्वास्थ्य केंद्र प्राथमिक स्वास्थ्य केंद्र और सामुदायिक स्वास्थ्य केंद्र--  डाक्टरों और नर्सों की कमी --1000 पर 0 . 7 और 1. 7 हैं 
3 . स्पेशलिस्ट्स की कमी --- जनरल सर्जन , स्त्री रोग विशेषज्ञ, शिशु रोग विशेषज्ञ , फिजिसियन और बेहोशी विशेषज्ञ 
Deccan Hearald .com Dec 22, 2017
सुपर स्पेशलिस्ट्स 
4000 कार्डियोलॉजिस्ट हैं 88000 की जरूरत है, 315 पीजी सीट्स 3375 होनी चाहियें । नेफ्रोलोजी --1200 डाक्टर , 40000 की जरूरत।  शिशु रोग विशेषज्ञ --23000 हैं , जरूरत --230000 . एंडोक्रिनोलोजिस्ट --650 हैं।  28000   की जरूरत है।  USA --20000 UG , 40000 PG . भारत --62000 UG , 14500 PG सीट्स 
Physicians per 1000 population --0.7
Nursesper 1000 population --1.7
Hospital beds per 1000 population --0.7
Institutional Delivary per 100,000 live births --190
Life expectancy--66.2 years 
4 . स्वास्थ्य पर जेब से खर्च बहुत ज्यादा है। 
5 स्वास्थ्य सेवाओं तक पहुंच की कमी और स्वास्थ्य सेवाएं प्राप्त करने के सामर्थ्य की कमी। 
6 . शहरी और ग्रामीण विभाजन --periodic labour force survey (2017 --18 ) प्रति ७ डाक्टरों में से सिर्फ 1 डाक्टर ग्रामीण क्षेत्र में है 6 शहरी क्षेत्र में हैं।  
7 . अमीर -- गरीब विभाजन 
8 . जेंडर विभाजन व जात आधारित  विभाजन 
9 . स्वास्थ्य कर्मियों के क्षमता निर्माण की कमी ( ट्रेनिंग की कमी )
10 अपने स्वास्थ्य के बारे जनता जागरूकता की कमी    
11 . टेक्नोलॉजी अपग्रडेशन की कमी 
12 . वातावरण  प्रदूषण --कीटनाशकों का अंधाधुंध इस्तेमाल 
13 . Govt Funded Health Insurance (GFHI)Schemes like Prime Minister Jan Arogya Yojna 

UTTRAKHAND/ Uttranchal


           
Uttarakhand slips to 17th spot in healthcare ranking, performs badly in almost all indicators
Prashant Jha | TNN | Jun 27, 2019, 14:05 IST
POPULATION--2020--1.17 crore 
13 districts
dehradoon largest district
BJP Govt.
DEHRADUN: Falling two slots from last year’s 15th rank,
Uttarakhand
 this year was relegated to the 17th position among 21 states of the country in the healthcare rankings recently released by central government think tank Niti Aayog in its report titled ‘Healthy States Progressive India: Report on Rank of States and UTs’.
The hill state has performed badly in all the three domains — sex ratio, infant mortality rate (IMR) and neonatal mortality rate (NMR).
The health index incorporates 23 indicators covering key aspects of the health sector's performance. These indicators were then grouped into three domains of 'health outcomes', governance' and 'information and key inputs.
The Himalayan state scored a dismal 40.22 in the index in the reference year (2017-18) compared to 45.22 in the base year (2015-16). The negative incremental change led to the state being ranked 19th in terms of improving its performance.
The report revealed that Uttarakhand has been one of the worst performers on almost all the 23 indicators used to prepare the index. While it ranked 14th in under-five mortality rate, 19th in sex ratio and 18th in number of institutional deliveries, it was the only state where neonatal mortality rate (number of deaths per thousand deliveries within 28 days of birth) has registered an increase.
“From the period 2015 to 2016, NMR declined in all larger states except for Uttarakhand where NMR increased from 28 to 32 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births,” read the report. Uttarakhand was placed 18th in this category.
Government officials, however, said that the report has taken into account "old data" and that the state has taken significant steps to improve on many of the indicators. “We have had significant progress on many of the indicators. While improving mortality rates take time, improvement in infrastructure is already visible,” said Yugal Kishore, mission director of National Health Mission.
Pant added that most of the state’s PHCs now have doctors while its performance at NMR reduction has also been "very good." “We have hired over 2,000 doctors and almost every PHC now has a doctor. Also, we have been one of the best states when it came to improving the sex ratio, NMR as well as IMR,” he said.

INDRANIL

Private healthcare industry in India: 4 common myths debunked

Indranil | Mantu Bose | July 15, 2020 | Updated 00:45 IST

To overcome the current challenges faced by the health system, a lot needs to change. First and foremost would be to build a strong pro-people non-commercialised public system as an alternative to the dominant for-profit sector

The Union and state governments must evolve a comprehensive, evidence-based mechanism to bring in private health services in a systematic and coordinated care model

The global crisis, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, has underscored the indispensability of a strong public healthcare system. As is the case with many other countries, in India too, the crisis exposed the weakness of the health system.

Due to systemic challenges that have perennially crippled the government health system, the response has been grossly inadequate. But the public sector and particularly the brave frontline health workers have been the only respite for people.

However, the role of private sector has been inadequate in overcoming the national crisis. Several news reports have exposed the regressive nature of the private sector. Either patients are being denied care, or charged high fees or being subjected to unnecessary tests to make money. There are also reports that patients' families are being beaten up for non-payment.

Here we would like to discuss some key features of private health care delivery in India, with an attempt to demystify some conceptions related to private health care delivery and point out some key concerns.

Also Read: Coronavirus pandemic leaves private healthcare sector in financial distress

We would primarily use the two latest NSSO rounds Household Social Consumption: Health, the 71st (2014)[i], and 75th rounds (2017-18) and complement them with some other data sources.

Myth one: Private sector delivers care where government does not reach

The National Health Policy 2017 recognised private sector as an engine of growth. Several other policy pronouncements have been made with the understanding that the private sector complements government health services. Although the sector has grown significantly in the last three decades as an outcome of a series of reforms, much of this growth took place in metropolitan cities.

The government funded health insurance (GFHI) schemes, like the Prime Minister's Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), are fuelling further expansion of for-profit private hospitals through transfer of public resources to ensure a reasonable market in smaller towns.

At the outset, the plurality of the private health sector must be emphasised upon. The private sector is not a homogenous entity. It has both formal and informal providers as well as for profit and not for-profit entities under it.

The non-corporate private sector comprises of single doctor dispensaries, 2-10 bed nursing homes, medium-sized facilities. Additionally, India has the facilities of the recognised traditional systems of medicine. Meanwhile, the formal sector comprises large corporate hospitals, diagnostics chains, and stand-alone super specialty facilities.

There is hardly any comprehensive data available on the size and composition of the private sector. However, a census of health facilities in 63 major cities conducted in 2012 suggests that the distribution of private facilities favours metropolitan cities.
**
Distribution is most skewed in case of corporate hospitals as around 67 per cent of them are located in big cities. Some of the notable big cities include the four metros--Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai, and upcoming metros such as Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Pune.

Mumbai has shown the highest presence of health facilities among all the big cities. Out of 13,413 private facilities across all cities, Mumbai alone has 2,119 facilities - contributing to around 16 per cent.

As per the Periodic Labour Force survey (2017-18) data, out of every seven doctors only one is located in rural areas, rest of the six are located in urban areas.

In the context of COVID-19, a key requirement for critical cases is the ICU beds. Approximately there were around 49 thousand ICU beds in private sector across all the cities. However, half of these beds are in 10 major cities, where the shortage of tertiary care facilities are less acute as many government medical colleges are located in these cities.

As per the 2012 data, there were more than 27 thousand ICU beds in public sector in these top ten cities. Thus, the private sector, rather than complementing the services of government, mushrooms around the tertiary government institutions to draw from the health care ecosystem created by public investment.

Another key feature of private hospitals is that most private facilities have less than 10 beds in their ICUs, which makes these places unviable for effective management of critical cases. Majority of the private sector outside these metro cities is much smaller in size, often equipped with five or less ICU beds. Rather than complementing public institutions, the private sector mushrooms around big government institutions.

Myth two: Private sector delivers 80% of care

Any discussion on health care delivery in the country starts with this emphatic assertion that private sector delivers 80% of care in the country. Though it is partially true that the majority of health care is delivered in the private sector, there are certain important trends to be noted.

First, private provisioning is more in case of out-patient (OP) care, however in the last 15 years, there has been a continuous decline in the utilisation of private care for OP care. Out of every 100 outpatient visits in rural areas, more than 67 took place in various types of private-both for-profit and not-for-profit facilities during 2017-18.

However, this is a decline from 72 in 2014 and from 78 in 2004, meaning that over the years an increasing proportion of people are moving away from private facilities. In urban areas, the overall utilisation of private facilities is more compared to rural areas, but there seems to be a gradual decline since 2004.


The use of private facilities is less for hospitalisation care compared to OP care. Out of every 100 hospitalisation cases, 54 and 65 are treated in private hospitals in rural areas and urban areas respectively.

In rural areas, the utilisation of private facilities has declined since 2004. In 2014 out of every 100 hospitalisation cases, 58 were treated in private hospitals. In 2017-18, this has declined to 54. Though the utilisation of private facilities is more common in urban areas, there was some decline between 2014 and 2017-18.

Reliance on private sector for child birth has also declined since 2004. The most significant decline is in the rural areas.

During 2004, almost half (47.6%) of the institutional deliveries were happening in the private sector. Thanks to initiatives like the National Rural Health Mission to promote institutional delivery and strengthen services in public facilities around child birth, now more than three-fourth of the institutional deliveries in rural areas happen in public facilities. In urban areas too, there has been a decline in private sector utilisation for child birth.

The utilisation of facilities varies considerably by economic class. With increasing well-being (measured in terms of consumption expenditure), people tend to utilise private facilities more and less of government facilities. In the bottom three quintiles, half or more people go to public facilities in rural areas. In urban areas, even among the poorest groups, more than half of the hospitalisation cases are treated in private facilities.


Apart from inadequate expansion of public sector hospitals and complaints about poor service quality (which is not the same as clinical quality), there has been a continuous push towards the private sector through the plethora of GFHI schemes, the latest Avatar being the PMJAY.

All of this together creates a situation where people, even from the economically vulnerable groups, are left with no other choice but to access private institutions.

Myth Three: Private care is free with insurance

A lot of people get drawn towards private sector and health insurance schemes because of the promise of free care. Free care through insurance is another major myth.

Apart from GFHIs, there are other insurance schemes that are sometimes organised by employers on behalf of their employees.

Then there is private voluntary health insurance (PVHI) that households buy for themselves.

Also Read: Coronavirus Lockdown XI: Why India's health policy needs a course correction

COVID-19 experience has shown that there is very little that private sector can offer in terms of reducing costs of care. Let us first start with how much households were paying on average for each hospitalisation episode in 2017-18 compared to 2014.

In order to do this effectively, we need to adjust the average expenditure of 2017-18, taking out the effect of rise in prices between the two periods.

Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) for hospitalisation has declined during this time period in terms of constant prices. The decline is steeper in urban areas compared to rural areas, though costs are generally higher in urban areas.

How much households would have to pay would depend on whether they choose to go to public or private hospitals for similar care needs. Public sector costs have decreased considerably in both urban and rural areas. Private sector costs on the other hand have increased in rural areas while declining marginally in urban areas in real terms, while it has increased in nominal terms.

In urban areas, people had to pay 3.6 times more in private sector compared to public hospitals in 2014. In rural areas this ratio is 3.3 times. In 2017-18, cost ratios increased to 5.8 and 5 for urban and rural areas respectively. Thus private sector costs are increasing rapidly while the public sector has been able to reduce the burden on households to some extent.


It is understandable that household costs in private sector would be higher compared to public hospitals. In public hospitals care is heavily subsidised, whereas in private sector, unless one has insurance coverage, the costs and profits are recovered basically digging into peoples' pockets.

Then is it the case that people with insurance coverage pay less compared to others? Clearly there is heavy expenditure incurred by households even if they have access to insurance and end up going to the private sector.


Policymakers at the National Health Authority and the NITI Aayog, who have so far been very vocal about handing over health care delivery to the private sector, have acknowledged in a recent press statement that PMJAY utilisation has gone down drastically during the lockdown phase.

As per the NHA report, between February and April, the number of treatments for essential non-covid procedures by both private and government hospitals across the country dropped by more than 20 per cent, mostly due to the coronavirus-induced lockdown.

During this two-month period, the number of procedures performed in those packages dropped to 1,51,672 from 1,93,679, the report said further. Between February and April, cancer-related procedures fell by about 57 per cent; cardiology by 76 per cent, and procedures in obstetrics and gynaecology fell by nearly 26 per cent, the report added.

As per news reports, the hospital bill for a COVID-19 patient with a five-day stay along with ICU facility usually crosses Rs 5 lakh. As per the latest PLFS data, only 5% population has an annual income of more than Rs 5 lakh. Therefore, either the vast majority would not be able to afford these rates, or resort to selling assets or borrowing.

Out of every three rupees spent on health, two rupees come from peoples' pockets in our country. Four out of ten rupees spent from pocket is on account of hospitalisation. High health care costs cause financial hardship for households, push them below poverty, and force them to borrow or sell assets.

Around 10.6 crore people are impoverished because they had to pay out of pocket for hospitalisation in 2017-18. Of these there are 6.8 crore people who live in rural areas. In the current context, while every household of the country is facing hardship and crores of people have been impoverished due to lockdown, the situation would be worse.

Thus the private sector neither complements the care provided by public sector, nor is it the dominant provider beyond OP care; nor could the claims of free care be substantiated.

On the other hand, with relatively less amount of investment, the public sector provides a significant part of clinical care along with an entire range of preventive care and public health services. At the same time, dependence on private sector is essentially iniquitous and impoverishing.

Myth four: private sector is efficient and it just needs regulation

It has been observed historically that for-profit private hospitals fail to ensure mechanisms that can provide effective treatment in case of public health emergencies.

There are certain typical market failures that define the functioning of private sector. Creme skimming, where more critical cases are refused and relatively safe patients are admitted, is quite common. Induced demand where information asymmetry is used to induce unnecessary care to patients and thereby charging high fees is another way through which the private sector makes money.

In times of public health emergencies, these tendencies become more prominent as people are more desperate and thus bring out more severe consequences on their lives. At this juncture any engagement with the private sector should strictly be in non-commercial terms where ensuring free care to patients and strict adherence to treatment protocols becomes key.

Waking up to the plight of people and denial of care, the Supreme Court and some state governments have attempted to cap the COVID-19 treatment prices. However, there are problems with partial price regulation.

The experience of capping stent prices suggests that the private sector would switch the burden to other charges and reap profit. The same is likely to happen in case of COVID-19 treatment. There is a need for comprehensive price regulation for all kinds of services.

If care can be delivered at regulated prices through PMJAY, CGHS or other insurance package rates, there is no reason similar care cannot be delivered at similar costs to individuals who do not have any protection of insurance.

The very first step towards this would be full disclosure of costs and prices under the Clinical Establishment Act and that a health care price index is developed which is sensitive to location and type of facility for the types of care provided. Such an effort would also help in better pricing of insurance packages.

The Union and state governments must evolve a comprehensive, evidence-based mechanism to bring in private health services in a systematic and coordinated care model. Any attempt to bring private sector hospitals into the net of publicly provided care should be on the basis of needs, competence and complementarity, rather than ad hoc arrangements.

Closing observations

To overcome the current challenges faced by the health system, a lot needs to change. First and foremost would be to build a strong pro-people non-commercialised public system as an alternative to the dominant for-profit sector.

This is the only way rational and good quality care can be delivered to the majority of the people. A strong public sector also works as the most effective means to regulate prices and practices in the private sector.

However, none of this can be achieved if we do not invest adequately in health. The current public spending of 1.15% of GDP on health is clearly suboptimal.

Unless we increase public investment in health to at least three per cent of GDP in the medium term and strengthen the government health system starting from primary care, peoples' miseries would continue and healthcare will continue to result in hardship and unbridled profit simultaneously.

(Indranil is an Associate Professor, OP Jindal Global University, and Mantu Bose is an Assistant Professor, TERI School of Advanced Studies.)