SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING HEALTH SECTOR IN HARYANA

 

SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING HEALTH SECTOR IN HARYANA

Decentralizing public health services:

Decentralizing public health services means moving some or all of the responsibilities and decision-making power from a central authority to local or regional authorities. This can help to make public health services more efficient and effective by making them fit the needs of different communities and populations. Putting public health services in different places could have a number of benefits. For instance: Local health officials may be better able to respond quickly to new health threats and epidemics if they have better tools. Decentralization can make it easier for local governments to be held accountable for their actions and results. Better coordination, Decentralized public health services can make it easier for healthcare providers, public health officials, and community groups to work together and work well together. Better local knowledge, Local governments may know more about the health needs and problems of their communities than a centralized government. More innovation, Decentralization can make it easier to try new things and come up with new ways to provide public health services. But there are also some problems with putting public health services in different places.

These things are:

Infrastructural development:

Improvements made to existing healthcare facilities and the introduction of new ones are examples of health infrastructure development. Access, quality, and efficiency in healthcare delivery may all be enhanced by investing in new healthcare infrastructure, such as hospitals, clinics, and other

facilities.Among the many potential gains from funding improvements to healthcare facilities are those that:More individuals will have access to

healthcare services they need if both new and old facilities are improved.Improving infrastructure may raise the bar on the quality of treatment offered

by hospitals and clinics, which in turn benefits patients.Reducing wait times, medical expenditures, and unhappiness among patients are all possible

results of updating healthcare facilities with modern technology.The creation of new employment in the construction and healthcare industries is a

further benefit of health infrastructure development.Attracts financial backing, a region's economy may profit from both inward investment and

outbound tourists if its healthcare facilities are well-developed.Investment, planning, and coordination among governments, healthcare providers, and

communities are crucial to the success of any health infrastructure development project. While planning healthcare facilities, it's important to think

about things like:There must be enough money to build and maintain a functional healthcare system. Healthcare infrastructure projects may be financed

by governments, private investors, or a combination of these and other sources.The development of health infrastructure should be directed bystrategic plan that considers the health requirements and priorities of the population, as well as the capabilities of the already-in-place facilities and

resources.To guarantee safe, accessible, and long-lasting facilities, healthcare infrastructure construction must comply to local laws, regulations, and

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 4, no 3, pp 4949-4958, March 2023 4957

building rules.Involvement of Stakeholders Healthcare providers, community members, and local authorities should all have a voice in the design and

construction of healthcare facilities.Healthcare access, quality of treatment, and economic growth may all be boosted by investing in health

infrastructure. To achieve effective implementation and long-term sustainability, a coordinated and collaborative strategy among diverse stakeholders is

necessary.

Improving the doctor-population ratio:

Access to healthcare is greatly aided by increasing the number of doctors per population, especially in locations where medical professionals are in

limited supply. Methods to increase the proportion of doctors in the population include the following:Raising the number of people enrolling in medical

school is one way to boost the number of physicians available. More individuals may be encouraged to pursue careers in medicine if governments and

other organizations provided financial aid in the form of scholarships and grants.The time and cost constraints that prohibit certain people from

pursuing a career in medicine may be reduced by streamlining the medical education process.

Increase the number of residency programs available to medical school graduates. Residents get the practical experience and training that is crucial for

becoming competent physicians. The number of practicing physicians may be boosted by increasing the number of residency slots available.Improved

access to healthcare services in disadvantaged regions may be achieved via Strategy, encouraging physicians to practice in such areas by offering them

financial incentives including debt forgiveness programs and tax credits.Telemedicine, Telemedicine may assist people in rural or underserved regions

get the medical attention they need by connecting them with specialists in other parts of the country. In places where medical professionals are in low

supply, this may be a big assistance.Bringing in medical professionals from other nations is one way to deal with localized doctor shortages. To recruit

medical professionals from other countries, governments and healthcare facilities might provide financial incentives.Ultimately, fixing the undersupply

of doctors calls for a multifaceted strategy that takes into account the many causes of the problem. To guarantee that people of all backgrounds and

financial means have access to high-quality healthcare services, governments and healthcare institutions may use a number of techniques.

Evidence-based health-care provision: Providers of healthcare who base their judgments on solid scientific evidence are said to practice "evidencebased medicine." Clinical decision making that is informed by high-quality research is at the heart of this method.Key concepts of providing healthcare

based on evidence include the following:Using the most reliable evidence, The best data, such as research papers, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses, should be used to inform therapeutic decision-making.clinicians should conduct a critical evaluation of the data to establish its application to

their own practice.clinicians should take into account patients' beliefs and preferences with the best available information when making treatment

judgments.To guarantee the delivery of high-quality treatment, clinicians should regularly assess and revise their procedures in light of new research

and patient input.Care must be coordinated, effective, and responsive to patients' needs, thus clinicians should work with other healthcare professionals,

patients, and families to achieve this goal.Care that is based on scientific evidence has been shown to improve health outcomes, boost patient happiness,

and save costs. Yet, a strong commitment to continuing education and training for healthcare personnel is necessary for successful implementation of

evidence-based procedures. Clinicians also need to be able to critically assess the available information and apply it effectively to the management of

specific patients since the quality and relevance of evidence might vary.Care that is based on the best available evidence is the best way to meet

patients' needs and improve outcomes.

Encouragement of patient participation: One of the keys to delivering excellent treatment is getting patients involved. Patient engagement increases

the likelihood that patients will learn about their health concerns, follow their treatment programs, and have positive results. These are some methods

that have been shown to increase patient involvement:One way to encourage patients to participate in their care is to provide them with information

about their diagnosis, potential treatments, and self-care. To further assist patients in comprehending their health requirements, healthcare professionals

might give them with educational programs, support groups, and individual counselling.By discussions of treatment alternatives, risks and advantages,

and the patient's unique preferences and beliefs, healthcare practitioners may promote shared decision-making between themselves and their patients.

By working together, doctor and patient increase the likelihood that the therapy will be a good fit.Third, hearing from patients may assist healthcare

practitioners learn how they're doing in meeting patients' requirements and where they can make improvements. Providers may learn from their patients

by asking for their opinions via patient satisfaction surveys, focus groups, and other forms of feedback.Fourth, technological advancements may be

leveraged to facilitate more patient engagement in their own healthcare. Patient portals, for instance, let people do things like see their medical records

online, set up appointments, and have direct conversations with their doctors. Patients' health may be tracked and they might be motivated to practice

preventative care with the use of wearable technology.Fifth is Patient advocacy, Advocates for patients may help healthcare practitioners increase

patient involvement in treatment decisions. Patients may get guidance and assistance from these organisations as they advocate for themselves inside

the healthcare system.

In conclusion, patient engagement is crucial to delivering person-centered care. Healthcare professionals may improve patient outcomes, save

healthcare costs, and boost patient satisfaction via patient engagement.

Communication between doctor-patient and treatment that is linguistically appropriate.

Quality healthcare delivery relies on open lines of communication between physicians and their patients. This is especially crucial when dealing with

patients and doctors who originate from diverse cultural backgrounds and/or speak different languages. The following methods may be used to promote

linguistically acceptable communication:When a patient and a provider have a language barrier, it is essential to engage experienced interpreters to

ensure clear communication. Using a patient's own friend or relative as an interpreter is not recommended, since this might lead to mistakes and

miscommunication.Offer resources in the patient's chosen language, Healthcare professionals should give documents, such as permission forms and

patient education materials, translated into the language of the patient. This can aid in making sure patients know what's going on with their bodies,

what their options are for care, and what those options entail.Medical professionals should communicate with patients using simple language, even

when explaining difficult topics or procedures. This may be useful for making sure people are aware of their diagnoses and treatments.Understanding

and respecting patients' cultural values and beliefs is a cornerstone of cultural competence, which healthcare providers should strive to achieve. This

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 4, no 3, pp 4949-4958, March 2023 4958

can improve patient outcomes by allowing doctors to tailor care to each individual's preferences and needs.Providers should engage in active listening

by focusing on the patient's concerns and asking follow-up questions as needed. As a result, the provider is more likely to meet the patient's

expectations and gain the patient's trust.Providing top-notch medical care relies heavily on clear and consistent communication between all parties

involved. Healthcare practitioners may assist enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction by being culturally and linguistically aware in their interactions

with patients.

CONCLUSION:

Haryana's healthcare sector has shown significant growth in recent years, with increased investments in infrastructure and technology, leading to an

increase in the number of hospitals and medical facilities in the state, as evidenced by an economic analysis of the sector that takes into account

demographic variables, the availability of health infrastructure, and the expenditure on health sector by the Haryana government. Most hospitals and

clinics in Haryana are privately owned, demonstrating the extent to which the private sector controls the healthcare system there. As a result, many

individuals cannot afford to get the high-quality medical treatment they need, creating a healthcare access problem. The government's attempts to

enhance healthcare in Haryana have fallen short due to a lack of funding, subpar facilities, and a shortage of qualified medical personnel. The ratio of

doctors to patients in Haryana is very low, and the state's healthcare education infrastructure is woefully insufficient. Because of this, medical workers

are overworked and providing subpar treatment to patients. Haryana's healthcare system is concentrated on the state's major cities, leaving the

countryside without adequate medical treatment. By investing in infrastructure and offering incentives to healthcare experts, the government can ensure

that residents in rural regions have access to high-quality healthcare. The healthcare system in Haryana has significant challenges due to the rising

prevalence of non-communicable illnesses including diabetes, hypertension, and cancer. To lessen the impact of these illnesses, the government should

invest in preventative measures including health education and awareness campaigns. Haryana's healthcare system is in dire need of more investment in

facilities, money, and people. To enhance health outcomes and decrease the burden of illness, the government of Haryana must play a more active role

in providing inexpensive and accessible healthcare services to the people of Haryana, especially in rural regions.

Bibliography:

Berman, P. (1995). Health Sector Reform: Making Health Development Sustainable. Health Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Making Health

Development Sustainable. Boston: Harvard University Press, PP.13‐33.

Bhat, R. & Jain, N. (2004). Analysis of public expenditure on health using State level data. Indian Institute of Management working paper no. 2004-06-

08. June. pp 1-44 Ahmedabad.

Mitra, A. (2006). The status of women among the scheduled tribes in India. The journal of Socioeconomics December pp-1-16.

Farahani, M. (2009). Effects of state-level public spending on health on the mortality probability in India.Harvard School of Public Health. Working

Paper No. 50 June pp 1- 32. USA.

Ghuman, B. S. & Mehta, A. (2009). Health care services in India: problems and prospects. International conference on Asian social protection in

comparative perspective at National university of Singapore. 7-9 January pp 1-15.

Ministry of Health and Family welfare. (2010). Annual report to people on Health. Government of India. New Delhi.

Acharya, D., Vaidyanathan, G. Muraleedharan, V. R. Dheenadayalan, & Dash, U. (2011). Do the Poor Benefit from Public Spending on Healthcare in

India? Results from Benefit (Utilisation) Incidence Analysis in Tamil Nadu and Orissa. Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems

(CREHS) April pp. 8-29 Chennai India.

Prinja, S., Kanavos, P. & Kumar, R. (2012). Health care inequities in north India: Role of public sector in universalizing health care. Indian Journal of

Medical research September. pp 421-431.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Health sector financing by Centre and States/Union Territories in India 2009-10 to 2015-16.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2015). Health care infrastructure and average rural population covered. (as on 31st March 2015).

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2015).Statewise shortfall in Health Infrastructure as per 2011 Population in India (As On 31st March 2015).

Rural Health Statistics 2013-14.

statistical abstract of Haryana 2020-21

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2015). Health care infrastructure and average rural population covered. (as on 31st March 2015).

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2015).Statewise shortfall in Health Infrastructure as per 2011 Population in India (As On 31st March 2015).

Rural Health Statistics 2013-14